<div dir="ltr">(take 2 since linux-bcache rejected the mail due to HTML parts.. gmail's new interface is a dream ;)<br><br>Hey Kent,<br><br>On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Kent Overstreet <<a href="mailto:koverstreet@google.com">koverstreet@google.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>> I've (finally!) got a bcache branch hacked up that ought to be suitable<br>> to go upstream, possibly in staging initially.<br>><br>> It's currently closer to the dev branch than the stable branch, plus<br>
> some additional minor changes to make it all more self contained. The<br>> code has seen a decent amount of testing and I think it's in good shape,<br>> but I'd like it if it could see a bit more testing before I see about<br>
> pushing it upstream.<br>><br>> If anyone wants to try it out, checkout the bcache-for-staging branch.<br>> It's against Linux 3.7.<br><br><br>I pulled your 'bcache-for-staging' code into a 'dm-devel-cache-bcache' branch on my github:<br>
<a href="https://github.com/snitm/linux">https://github.com/snitm/linux</a><br><br>Purpose is to have a single kernel to compare dm-cache and bcache. My branch is against 3.8-rc2. While importing your code I needed the following change to get bcache to compile:<br>
<a href="https://github.com/snitm/linux/commit/400b1257e93975864fd6c4b827537a0234551253">https://github.com/snitm/linux/commit/400b1257e93975864fd6c4b827537a0234551253</a><br><br>It now builds without issue but I haven't tested the resulting bcache to know if I broke the sysfs interface due to s/cache/bcache/ on some local variables, I don't think I did but I'll defer to you. (BTW those crafty sysfs macros you have were pretty opaque; not really seeing what they buy in the grand scheme. And #include "sysfs.c" is different than any code I've seen in the kernel).</div>