[edk2-devel] [Patch] BaseTools: Fix GCC compiler failure in new added tools.
Liming Gao
liming.gao at intel.com
Tue Jul 9 01:29:35 UTC 2019
Philippe:
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [mailto:philmd at redhat.com]
>Sent: Monday, July 08, 2019 11:49 PM
>To: devel at edk2.groups.io; Gao, Liming <liming.gao at intel.com>
>Cc: Gao, Zhichao <zhichao.gao at intel.com>; Feng, Bob C
><bob.c.feng at intel.com>
>Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch] BaseTools: Fix GCC compiler failure in new
>added tools.
>
>Hi,
>
>On 7/5/19 9:51 AM, Liming Gao wrote:
>> From: gaozhic <zhichao.gao at intel.com>
>>
>> GCC 7 or 8 reports some warnings in new added FCE/FMMT/BlmLib.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao at intel.com>
>> Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng at intel.com>
>> ---
>> BaseTools/Source/C/BfmLib/BfmLib.c | 2 +-
>> BaseTools/Source/C/FCE/BinaryParse.c | 2 +-
>> BaseTools/Source/C/FMMT/FirmwareModuleManagement.c | 2 +-
>> BaseTools/Source/C/FMMT/FmmtLib.c | 2 +-
>> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/BfmLib/BfmLib.c
>b/BaseTools/Source/C/BfmLib/BfmLib.c
>> index 9dedda3da2..5b7d5859fd 100644
>> --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/BfmLib/BfmLib.c
>> +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/BfmLib/BfmLib.c
>> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ LibInitializeFvStruct (
>>
>> for (Index = 0; Index < MAX_NUMBER_OF_FILES_IN_FV; Index ++) {
>> memset (Fv->FfsAttuibutes[Index].FfsName, '\0', _MAX_PATH);
>> - memset (Fv->FfsAttuibutes[Index].UiName, '\0', _MAX_PATH);
>> + memset (Fv->FfsAttuibutes[Index].UiName, '\0', _MAX_PATH * sizeof
>(CHAR16));
>
>What about using wmemset() here? (I'm not sure it would be correct, I
>just wonder).
>
They should be same here. Here use memset to keep the same usage with others.
>>
>> Fv->FfsAttuibutes[Index].IsLeaf = TRUE;
>> Fv->FfsAttuibutes[Index].TotalSectionNum = 0;
>> diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/FCE/BinaryParse.c
>b/BaseTools/Source/C/FCE/BinaryParse.c
>> index e9f8ee6826..3321963cb8 100644
>> --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/FCE/BinaryParse.c
>> +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/FCE/BinaryParse.c
>> @@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ Done:
>> ) {
>> continue;
>> }
>> - sprintf (FileNameArry, "%s%c%s", FolderName, OS_SEP, pDirent-
>>d_name);
>> + snprintf (FileNameArry, MAX_FILENAME_LEN, FolderName, OS_SEP,
>pDirent->d_name);
>
>You dropped the format string...
>
Good catch. I will fix it in next version.
Thanks
Liming
>> FfsFile = fopen (FileNameArry, "rb");
>> Status = ReadFfsHeader (FfsFile, (UINT32 *)&FileSize);
>> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>> diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/FMMT/FirmwareModuleManagement.c
>b/BaseTools/Source/C/FMMT/FirmwareModuleManagement.c
>> index 63ae3c45a4..6648fbd54f 100644
>> --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/FMMT/FirmwareModuleManagement.c
>> +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/FMMT/FirmwareModuleManagement.c
>> @@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ FmmtImageDelete (
>> // If decrease operation executed, we should adjust the ffs list. It
>will bring in more complex.
>> //
>> //FvInFd->FfsNumbers -= 1;
>> - memset(FvInFd->FfsAttuibutes[Index].UiName, '\0',
>_MAX_PATH);
>> + memset(FvInFd->FfsAttuibutes[Index].UiName, '\0',
>_MAX_PATH * sizeof (CHAR16));
>> if (FvInFd->FfsAttuibutes[Index].FvLevel > 1) {
>> for (j = Index - 1; j >= 0; j--) {
>> if (FvInFd->FfsAttuibutes[j].FvLevel == FvInFd-
>>FfsAttuibutes[Index].FvLevel - 1) {
>> diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/FMMT/FmmtLib.c
>b/BaseTools/Source/C/FMMT/FmmtLib.c
>> index f87042114b..e477a52987 100644
>> --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/FMMT/FmmtLib.c
>> +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/FMMT/FmmtLib.c
>> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ LibInitializeFvStruct (
>>
>> for (Index = 0; Index < MAX_NUMBER_OF_FILES_IN_FV; Index ++) {
>> memset (Fv->FfsAttuibutes[Index].FfsName, '\0', _MAX_PATH);
>> - memset (Fv->FfsAttuibutes[Index].UiName, '\0', _MAX_PATH);
>> + memset (Fv->FfsAttuibutes[Index].UiName, '\0', _MAX_PATH * sizeof
>(CHAR16));
>> memset (&Fv->FfsAttuibutes[Index].GuidName, '\0', sizeof(EFI_GUID));
>> Fv->FfsAttuibutes[Index].UiNameSize = 0;
>> Fv->FfsAttuibutes[Index].IsLeaf = TRUE;
>>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#43415): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/43415
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32315476/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More information about the edk2-devel-archive
mailing list