[edk2-devel] [Patch 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Avoid AP calls gBS service.
Zeng, Star
star.zeng at intel.com
Fri Jul 12 10:53:00 UTC 2019
Some minor comments inline.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dong, Eric
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 9:53 AM
> To: devel at edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni at intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com>; Kumar,
> Chandana C <chandana.c.kumar at intel.com>; Zeng, Star
> <star.zeng at intel.com>
> Subject: [Patch 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Avoid AP calls gBS
> service.
"gBS service" is not match with the assertion information, gBS is the concept in DXE phase.
So here, please "PEI service" to be accurate.
>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1972
>
> AP calls CollectProcessorData() to collect processor info.
> CollectProcessorData function finally calls PcdGetSize function to
> get DynamicPCD PcdCpuFeaturesSetting value. PcdGetSize will use gBS
Same comments with above.
> which caused below assert info:
> Processor Info: Package: 1, MaxCore : 4, MaxThread: 1
> Package: 0, Valid Core : 4
> ASSERT [CpuFeaturesPei] c:\projects\jsl\jsl_v1193\Edk2\MdePkg\Library
> \PeiServicesTablePointerLibIdt\PeiServicesTablePointer.c(48):
> PeiServices != ((void *) 0)
>
> This change uses saved global pcd size instead of calls PcdGetSize to
> fix this issue.
>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni at intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com>
> Cc: Chandana Kumar <chandana.c.kumar at intel.com>
> Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong at intel.com>
> ---
> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
> a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> index aff7ad600c..87bfc64250 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/CpuFeaturesInitialize.c
> @@ -246,19 +246,20 @@ CpuInitDataInitialize (
>
> @param[in] SupportedFeatureMask The pointer to CPU feature bits mask
> buffer
> @param[in] OrFeatureBitMask The feature bit mask to do OR operation
> + @param[in] BitMaskSize The CPU feature bits mask buffer size.
> +
> **/
> VOID
> SupportedMaskOr (
> IN UINT8 *SupportedFeatureMask,
> - IN UINT8 *OrFeatureBitMask
> + IN UINT8 *OrFeatureBitMask,
> + IN UINT32 BitMaskSize
> )
> {
> UINTN Index;
> - UINTN BitMaskSize;
> UINT8 *Data1;
> UINT8 *Data2;
>
> - BitMaskSize = PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSetting);
> Data1 = SupportedFeatureMask;
> Data2 = OrFeatureBitMask;
> for (Index = 0; Index < BitMaskSize; Index++) {
> @@ -384,12 +385,14 @@ CollectProcessorData (
> //
> SupportedMaskOr (
> CpuFeaturesData-
> >InitOrder[ProcessorNumber].FeaturesSupportedMask,
> - CpuFeature->FeatureMask
> + CpuFeature->FeatureMask,
> + CpuFeaturesData->BitMaskSize
> );
> } else if (CpuFeature->SupportFunc (ProcessorNumber, CpuInfo,
> CpuFeature->ConfigData)) {
> SupportedMaskOr (
> CpuFeaturesData-
> >InitOrder[ProcessorNumber].FeaturesSupportedMask,
> - CpuFeature->FeatureMask
> + CpuFeature->FeatureMask,
> + CpuFeaturesData->BitMaskSize
> );
> }
> Entry = Entry->ForwardLink;
> diff --git
> a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
> index fa0f0b41e2..36aabd7267 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
> +++
> b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
> @@ -658,6 +658,11 @@ RegisterCpuFeatureWorker (
> InitializeListHead (&CpuFeaturesData->FeatureList);
> InitializeSpinLock (&CpuFeaturesData->CpuFlags.MemoryMappedLock);
> InitializeSpinLock (&CpuFeaturesData->CpuFlags.ConsoleLogLock);
> + //
> + // Driver has assumption that these three PCD should has same buffer
> size.
It is library, not driver. So how about "The code has assumption that these three PCDs should have same buffer size."?
The proposed sentence also uses 'PCDs' and 'have'.
With the comments handled, Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng at intel.com>
Thanks,
Star
> + //
> + ASSERT (PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSetting) == PcdGetSize
> (PcdCpuFeaturesCapability));
> + ASSERT (PcdGetSize (PcdCpuFeaturesSetting) == PcdGetSize
> (PcdCpuFeaturesSupport));
> CpuFeaturesData->BitMaskSize = (UINT32) BitMaskSize;
> }
> ASSERT (CpuFeaturesData->BitMaskSize == BitMaskSize);
> --
> 2.21.0.windows.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#43654): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/43654
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32437607/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More information about the edk2-devel-archive
mailing list