[edk2-devel] [PATCH v4 0/7] CryptoPkg: Upgrade OpenSSL to 1.1.1b

Laszlo Ersek lersek at redhat.com
Fri May 17 13:16:57 UTC 2019


On 05/17/19 15:04, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 05/17/19 07:11, Wang, Jian J wrote:
>> Hi Laszlo,
>>
>> There's already a float library used in OpensslLib.inf. 
>>
>> [LibraryClasses.ARM]
>>   ArmSoftFloatLib
>>
>> The problem is that the below instance doesn't implement __aeabi_ui2d
>> and __aeabi_d2uiz (I encountered this one as well)
>>
>>   ArmPkg\Library\ArmSoftFloatLib\ArmSoftFloatLib.inf
>>
>> I think we can update this library support those two APIs. So what about
>> we still push the patch and file a BZ to fix this issue?
> 
> I'm OK with that, but it will break ARM and AARCH64 platforms that
> consume OpensslLib (directly or through BaseCryptLib), so this question
> is up to Leif and Ard to decide.

Correction: break ARM platforms only, not AARCH64.

Laszlo

> Thanks
> Laszlo
> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek at redhat.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 2:26 AM
>>> To: devel at edk2.groups.io; Lu, XiaoyuX <xiaoyux.lu at intel.com>
>>> Cc: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang at intel.com>; Ye, Ting <ting.ye at intel.com>; Ard
>>> Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org>; Leif Lindholm
>>> <leif.lindholm at linaro.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v4 0/7] CryptoPkg: Upgrade OpenSSL to 1.1.1b
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> (+ Ard and Leif)
>>>
>>> On 05/16/19 09:54, Xiaoyu lu wrote:
>>>> This series is also available at:
>>>>
>>> https://github.com/xiaoyuxlu/edk2/tree/bz_1089_upgrade_to_openssl_1_1_1b
>>> _v4
>>>>
>>>> Changes:
>>>>
>>>> (1) CryptoPkgOpensslLib: Modify process_files.pl for  upgrading OpenSSL
>>>>
>>>> (2) CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Exclude unnecessary files in process_files.pl
>>>>     crypto/store/* are excluded.
>>>>     crypto/rand/randfile.c is excluded.
>>>>
>>>> (3) CryptoPkg/IntrinsicLib: Fix possible unresolved external symbol issue
>>>>
>>>> (4) CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Prepare for upgrading OpenSSL
>>>>     Disable warnings for buiding OpenSSL_1_1_1b
>>>>
>>>> (5) CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Fix cross-build problem for AARCH64
>>>>
>>>> (6) CryptoPkg: Upgrade OpenSSL to 1.1.1b
>>>>     The biggest change is use TSC as entropy source
>>>>     If TSC isn't avaiable, fallback to TimerLib(PerformanceCounter).
>>>>
>>>> (7) CryptoPkg/BaseCryptLib: Make HMAC_CTX size backward compatible
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Verification done for this series:
>>>> * Https boot in OvmfPkg.
>>>> * BaseCrypt Library test. (Ovmf, EmulatorPkg)
>>>>
>>>> Important notice:
>>>> Nt32Pkg doesn't support TimerLib
>>>>>
>>> TimerLib|MdePkg/Library/BaseTimerLibNullTemplate/BaseTimerLibNullTemplat
>>> e.inf
>>>> So it will failed in Nt32Pkg.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang at intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Ting Ye <ting.ye at intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Laszlo Ersek (1):
>>>>   CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Fix cross-build problem for AARCH64
>>>>
>>>> Xiaoyu Lu (6):
>>>>   CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Modify process_files.pl for upgrading OpenSSL
>>>>   CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Exclude unnecessary files in process_files.pl
>>>>   CryptoPkg/IntrinsicLib: Fix possible unresolved external symbol issue
>>>>   CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Prepare for upgrading OpenSSL
>>>>   CryptoPkg: Upgrade OpenSSL to 1.1.1b
>>>>   CryptoPkg/BaseCryptLib: Make HMAC_CTX size backward compatible
>>>>
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/IntrinsicLib/IntrinsicLib.inf    |   4 +-
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/OpensslLib.inf        |  76 ++++-
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/OpensslLibCrypto.inf  |  67 ++++-
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/Include/CrtLibSupport.h          |  13 +-
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/Include/openssl/opensslconf.h    |  54 +++-
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/Include/sys/syscall.h            |  11 +
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/buildinf.h            |   2 +
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/rand_pool_noise.h     |  29 ++
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/BaseCryptLib/Hmac/CryptHmacMd5.c |   8 +-
>>>>  .../Library/BaseCryptLib/Hmac/CryptHmacSha1.c      |   9 +-
>>>>  .../Library/BaseCryptLib/Hmac/CryptHmacSha256.c    |   8 +-
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/IntrinsicLib/Ia32/MathFtol.c     |  22 ++
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/ossl_store.c          |  17 ++
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/rand_pool.c           | 316
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/rand_pool_noise.c     |  29 ++
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/rand_pool_noise_tsc.c |  43 +++
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl               |   2 +-
>>>>  CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/process_files.pl      |  11 +-
>>>>  18 files changed, 669 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>>>>  create mode 100644 CryptoPkg/Library/Include/sys/syscall.h
>>>>  create mode 100644 CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/rand_pool_noise.h
>>>>  create mode 100644 CryptoPkg/Library/IntrinsicLib/Ia32/MathFtol.c
>>>>  create mode 100644 CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/ossl_store.c
>>>>  create mode 100644 CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/rand_pool.c
>>>>  create mode 100644 CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/rand_pool_noise.c
>>>>  create mode 100644 CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/rand_pool_noise_tsc.c
>>>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I've found another build issue with this series. (My
>>> apologies that I didn't discover it earlier.) It is reported in the
>>> 32-bit (ARM) build of the ArmVirtQemu platform:
>>>
>>>   CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/rand/drbg_lib.c:1028:
>>>   undefined reference to `__aeabi_ui2d'
>>>
>>> The referenced line is from the drbg_add() function:
>>>
>>>     if (buflen < seedlen || randomness < (double) seedlen) {
>>>
>>> Beyond the failure to resolve the "__aeabi_ui2d" symbol, the edk2 coding
>>> style spec says, "Floating point operations are not recommended in UEFI
>>> firmware." (Even though the UEFI spec describes the required floating
>>> point environment for all architectures.)
>>>
>>> So, I'm not sure what we should do here. If we think that floating point
>>> is plain evil in edk2, then we cannot rebase edk2 to OpenSSL-1.1.1b.
>>>
>>> ... Hmmm, this seems to be the 32-bit ARM variant of [PATCH v4 3/7]!
>>>
>>> If we find floating point generally acceptable in edk2, then Ard and
>>> Leif could help us decide please whether this 32-bit ARM issue should be
>>> fixed during the feature freeze (when fixes are still allowed), or if it
>>> justifies postponing OpenSSL 1.1.1b to the next edk2 stable tag.
>>>
>>> Again, I'm sorry that I found this only now -- but
>>> "CryptoPkg/CryptoPkg.dsc" is multi-arch:
>>>
>>>   SUPPORTED_ARCHITECTURES        = IA32|X64|ARM|AARCH64
>>>
>>> thus, preferably, a CryptoPkg patch series should be at least build
>>> tested (if not boot tested) for all arches, before being posted to the
>>> mailing list.
>>>
>>> (Yes, CI would help a lot with such issues.)
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Laszlo
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#40920): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/40920
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/31638503/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-




More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list