[edk2-devel] [Patch v3 2/2] MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: Add Variable Lock Protocol Unit Tests
Wu, Hao A
hao.a.wu at intel.com
Fri Dec 11 05:43:13 UTC 2020
With below typos fixed:
"Procol" -> "Protocol"
"succced" -> "succeed"
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu at intel.com>
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel at edk2.groups.io <devel at edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Michael
> D Kinney
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 12:52 PM
> To: devel at edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu at intel.com>; Liming Gao
> <gaoliming at byosoft.com.cn>; Bret Barkelew
> <Bret.Barkelew at microsoft.com>
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [Patch v3 2/2] MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe:
> Add Variable Lock Protocol Unit Tests
>
> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111
>
> Add host based unit tests for the multiple lock case using Variable Lock
> Protocol, Variable Policy Protocol, and mixes of Variable Lock Protocol and
> Variable Policy Protocol.
>
> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney at intel.com>
> Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu at intel.com>
> Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming at byosoft.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew at microsoft.com>
> ---
> MdeModulePkg/Test/MdeModulePkgHostTest.dsc | 11 +
> .../VariableLockRequestToLockUnitTest.c | 565 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../VariableLockRequestToLockUnitTest.inf | 36 ++
> 3 files changed, 612 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
> MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/RuntimeDxeUnitTest/Vari
> ableLockRequestToLockUnitTest.c
> create mode 100644
> MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/RuntimeDxeUnitTest/Vari
> ableLockRequestToLockUnitTest.inf
>
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Test/MdeModulePkgHostTest.dsc
> b/MdeModulePkg/Test/MdeModulePkgHostTest.dsc
> index 72a119db4568..4da4692c8451 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Test/MdeModulePkgHostTest.dsc
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Test/MdeModulePkgHostTest.dsc
> @@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ [Defines]
>
> !include UnitTestFrameworkPkg/UnitTestFrameworkPkgHost.dsc.inc
>
> +[LibraryClasses]
> + SafeIntLib|MdePkg/Library/BaseSafeIntLib/BaseSafeIntLib.inf
> +
> [Components]
>
> MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeResetSystemLib/UnitTest/MockUefiRuntimeSer
> vicesTableLib.inf
>
> @@ -30,3 +33,11 @@ [Components]
>
> ResetSystemLib|MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeResetSystemLib/DxeResetSyst
> emLib.inf
>
> UefiRuntimeServicesTableLib|MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeResetSystemLib/
> UnitTest/MockUefiRuntimeServicesTableLib.inf
> }
> +
> +
> MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/RuntimeDxeUnitTest/Vari
> ableLockRequestToLockUnitTest.inf {
> + <LibraryClasses>
> +
> VariablePolicyLib|MdeModulePkg/Library/VariablePolicyLib/VariablePolicyLi
> b.inf
> +
> VariablePolicyHelperLib|MdeModulePkg/Library/VariablePolicyHelperLib/Va
> riablePolicyHelperLib.inf
> + <PcdsFixedAtBuild>
> +
> +
> gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdAllowVariablePolicyEnforcementDis
> abl
> + e|TRUE
> + }
> diff --git
> a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/RuntimeDxeUnitTest/Va
> riableLockRequestToLockUnitTest.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/RuntimeDxeUnitTest/Va
> riableLockRequestToLockUnitTest.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a5bf720f42e1
> --- /dev/null
> +++
> b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/RuntimeDxeUnitTest/Va
> ri
> +++ ableLockRequestToLockUnitTest.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,565 @@
> +/** @file
> + This is a host-based unit test for the VariableLockRequestToLock shim.
> +
> + Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation.
> + SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> +
> +**/
> +
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <stdarg.h>
> +#include <stddef.h>
> +#include <setjmp.h>
> +#include <cmocka.h>
> +
> +#include <Uefi.h>
> +#include <Library/DebugLib.h>
> +#include <Library/BaseMemoryLib.h>
> +#include <Library/MemoryAllocationLib.h> #include
> +<Library/UnitTestLib.h> #include <Library/VariablePolicyLib.h> #include
> +<Library/VariablePolicyHelperLib.h>
> +
> +#include <Protocol/VariableLock.h>
> +
> +#define UNIT_TEST_NAME "VarPol/VarLock Shim Unit Test"
> +#define UNIT_TEST_VERSION "1.0"
> +
> +///=== CODE UNDER TEST
> +=========================================================
> ==============
> +====
> +
> +EFI_STATUS
> +EFIAPI
> +VariableLockRequestToLock (
> + IN CONST EDKII_VARIABLE_LOCK_PROTOCOL *This,
> + IN CHAR16 *VariableName,
> + IN EFI_GUID *VendorGuid
> + );
> +
> +///=== TEST DATA
> +=========================================================
> ==============
> +===========
> +
> +//
> +// Test GUID 1 {F955BA2D-4A2C-480C-BFD1-3CC522610592}
> +//
> +EFI_GUID mTestGuid1 = {
> + 0xf955ba2d, 0x4a2c, 0x480c, {0xbf, 0xd1, 0x3c, 0xc5, 0x22, 0x61, 0x5,
> +0x92} };
> +
> +//
> +// Test GUID 2 {2DEA799E-5E73-43B9-870E-C945CE82AF3A}
> +//
> +EFI_GUID mTestGuid2 = {
> + 0x2dea799e, 0x5e73, 0x43b9, {0x87, 0xe, 0xc9, 0x45, 0xce, 0x82, 0xaf,
> +0x3a} };
> +
> +//
> +// Test GUID 3 {698A2BFD-A616-482D-B88C-7100BD6682A9}
> +//
> +EFI_GUID mTestGuid3 = {
> + 0x698a2bfd, 0xa616, 0x482d, {0xb8, 0x8c, 0x71, 0x0, 0xbd, 0x66, 0x82,
> +0xa9} };
> +
> +#define TEST_VAR_1_NAME L"TestVar1"
> +#define TEST_VAR_2_NAME L"TestVar2"
> +#define TEST_VAR_3_NAME L"TestVar3"
> +
> +#define TEST_POLICY_ATTRIBUTES_NULL 0
> +#define TEST_POLICY_MIN_SIZE_NULL 0
> +#define TEST_POLICY_MAX_SIZE_NULL MAX_UINT32
> +
> +#define TEST_POLICY_MIN_SIZE_10 10
> +#define TEST_POLICY_MAX_SIZE_200 200
> +
> +///=== HELPER FUNCTIONS
> +=========================================================
> ==============
> +====
> +
> +/**
> + Mocked version of GetVariable, for testing.
> +
> + @param VariableName
> + @param VendorGuid
> + @param Attributes
> + @param DataSize
> + @param Data
> +**/
> +EFI_STATUS
> +EFIAPI
> +StubGetVariableNull (
> + IN CHAR16 *VariableName,
> + IN EFI_GUID *VendorGuid,
> + OUT UINT32 *Attributes, OPTIONAL
> + IN OUT UINTN *DataSize,
> + OUT VOID *Data OPTIONAL
> + )
> +{
> + UINT32 MockedAttr;
> + UINTN MockedDataSize;
> + VOID *MockedData;
> + EFI_STATUS MockedReturn;
> +
> + check_expected_ptr (VariableName);
> + check_expected_ptr (VendorGuid);
> + check_expected_ptr (DataSize);
> +
> + MockedAttr = (UINT32)mock();
> + MockedDataSize = (UINTN)mock();
> + MockedData = (VOID*)(UINTN)mock();
> + MockedReturn = (EFI_STATUS)mock();
> +
> + if (Attributes != NULL) {
> + *Attributes = MockedAttr;
> + }
> + if (Data != NULL && !EFI_ERROR (MockedReturn)) {
> + CopyMem (Data, MockedData, MockedDataSize); }
> +
> + *DataSize = MockedDataSize;
> +
> + return MockedReturn;
> +}
> +
> +//
> +// Anything you think might be helpful that isn't a test itself.
> +//
> +
> +/**
> + This is a common setup function that will ensure the library is
> +always
> + initialized with the stubbed GetVariable.
> +
> + Not used by all test cases, but by most.
> +
> + @param[in] Context Unit test case context **/ STATIC
> +UNIT_TEST_STATUS EFIAPI LibInitMocked (
> + IN UNIT_TEST_CONTEXT Context
> + )
> +{
> + return EFI_ERROR (InitVariablePolicyLib (StubGetVariableNull)) ?
> +UNIT_TEST_ERROR_PREREQUISITE_NOT_MET : UNIT_TEST_PASSED; }
> +
> +/**
> + Common cleanup function to make sure that the library is always
> +de-initialized
> + prior to the next test case.
> +
> + @param[in] Context Unit test case context **/ STATIC VOID EFIAPI
> +LibCleanup (
> + IN UNIT_TEST_CONTEXT Context
> + )
> +{
> + DeinitVariablePolicyLib();
> +}
> +
> +///=== TEST CASES
> +=========================================================
> ==============
> +==========
> +
> +///===== SHIM SUITE
> +=========================================================
> ==
> +
> +/**
> + Test Case that locks a single variable using the Variable Lock Protocol.
> + The call is expected to succeed.
> +
> + @param[in] Context Unit test case context **/ UNIT_TEST_STATUS
> +EFIAPI LockingWithoutAnyPoliciesShouldSucceed (
> + IN UNIT_TEST_CONTEXT Context
> + )
> +{
> + EFI_STATUS Status;
> +
> + Status = VariableLockRequestToLock (NULL, TEST_VAR_1_NAME,
> + &mTestGuid1); UT_ASSERT_NOT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> +
> + return UNIT_TEST_PASSED;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + Test Case that locks the same variable twice using the Variable Lock Procol.
> + Both calls are expected to succeed.
> +
> + @param[in] Context Unit test case context
> + **/
> +UNIT_TEST_STATUS
> +EFIAPI
> +LockingTwiceShouldSucceed (
> + IN UNIT_TEST_CONTEXT Context
> + )
> +{
> + EFI_STATUS Status;
> +
> + Status = VariableLockRequestToLock (NULL, TEST_VAR_1_NAME,
> + &mTestGuid1); UT_ASSERT_NOT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> +
> + Status = VariableLockRequestToLock (NULL, TEST_VAR_1_NAME,
> + &mTestGuid1); UT_ASSERT_NOT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> +
> + return UNIT_TEST_PASSED;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + Test Case that locks a variable using the Variable Policy Protocol
> +then locks
> + the same variable using the Variable Lock Protocol.
> + Both calls are expected to succeed.
> +
> + @param[in] Context Unit test case context
> + **/
> +UNIT_TEST_STATUS
> +EFIAPI
> +LockingALockedVariableShouldSucceed (
> + IN UNIT_TEST_CONTEXT Context
> + )
> +{
> + EFI_STATUS Status;
> + VARIABLE_POLICY_ENTRY *NewEntry;
> +
> + //
> + // Create a variable policy that locks the variable.
> + //
> + Status = CreateBasicVariablePolicy (
> + &mTestGuid1,
> + TEST_VAR_1_NAME,
> + TEST_POLICY_MIN_SIZE_NULL,
> + TEST_POLICY_MAX_SIZE_200,
> + TEST_POLICY_ATTRIBUTES_NULL,
> + TEST_POLICY_ATTRIBUTES_NULL,
> + VARIABLE_POLICY_TYPE_LOCK_NOW,
> + &NewEntry
> + );
> + UT_ASSERT_NOT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> +
> + //
> + // Register the new policy.
> + //
> + Status = RegisterVariablePolicy (NewEntry);
> +
> + Status = VariableLockRequestToLock (NULL, TEST_VAR_1_NAME,
> + &mTestGuid1); UT_ASSERT_NOT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> +
> + FreePool (NewEntry);
> +
> + return UNIT_TEST_PASSED;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + Test Case that locks a variable using the Variable Policy Protocol
> +with a
> + policy other than LOCK_NOW then attempts to lock the same variable
> +using the
> + Variable Lock Protocol. The call to Variable Policy is expected to
> +succced
> + and the call to Variable Lock is expected to fail.
> +
> + @param[in] Context Unit test case context
> + **/
> +UNIT_TEST_STATUS
> +EFIAPI
> +LockingAnUnlockedVariableShouldFail (
> + IN UNIT_TEST_CONTEXT Context
> + )
> +{
> + EFI_STATUS Status;
> + VARIABLE_POLICY_ENTRY *NewEntry;
> +
> + // Create a variable policy that locks the variable.
> + Status = CreateVarStateVariablePolicy (&mTestGuid1,
> + TEST_VAR_1_NAME,
> + TEST_POLICY_MIN_SIZE_NULL,
> + TEST_POLICY_MAX_SIZE_200,
> + TEST_POLICY_ATTRIBUTES_NULL,
> + TEST_POLICY_ATTRIBUTES_NULL,
> + &mTestGuid2,
> + 1,
> + TEST_VAR_2_NAME,
> + &NewEntry);
> + UT_ASSERT_NOT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> +
> + // Register the new policy.
> + Status = RegisterVariablePolicy (NewEntry);
> +
> + // Configure the stub to not care about parameters. We're testing errors.
> + expect_any_always( StubGetVariableNull, VariableName );
> + expect_any_always( StubGetVariableNull, VendorGuid );
> + expect_any_always( StubGetVariableNull, DataSize );
> +
> + // With a policy, make sure that writes still work, since the variable doesn't
> exist.
> + will_return( StubGetVariableNull, TEST_POLICY_ATTRIBUTES_NULL ); //
> Attributes
> + will_return( StubGetVariableNull, 0 ); // Size
> + will_return( StubGetVariableNull, NULL ); // DataPtr
> + will_return( StubGetVariableNull, EFI_NOT_FOUND); // Status
> +
> + Status = VariableLockRequestToLock (NULL, TEST_VAR_1_NAME,
> + &mTestGuid1); UT_ASSERT_TRUE (EFI_ERROR (Status));
> +
> + FreePool (NewEntry);
> +
> + return UNIT_TEST_PASSED;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + Test Case that locks a variable using the Variable Policy Protocol
> +with a
> + policy other than LOCK_NOW, but is currently locked. Then attempts
> +to lock
> + the same variable using the Variable Lock Protocol. The call to
> +Variable
> + Policy is expected to succced and the call to Variable Lock also
> +expected to
> + succeed.
> +
> + @param[in] Context Unit test case context
> + **/
> +UNIT_TEST_STATUS
> +EFIAPI
> +LockingALockedVariableWithMatchingDataShouldSucceed (
> + IN UNIT_TEST_CONTEXT Context
> + )
> +{
> + EFI_STATUS Status;
> + VARIABLE_POLICY_ENTRY *NewEntry;
> + UINT8 Data;
> +
> + // Create a variable policy that locks the variable.
> + Status = CreateVarStateVariablePolicy (&mTestGuid1,
> + TEST_VAR_1_NAME,
> + TEST_POLICY_MIN_SIZE_NULL,
> + TEST_POLICY_MAX_SIZE_200,
> + TEST_POLICY_ATTRIBUTES_NULL,
> + TEST_POLICY_ATTRIBUTES_NULL,
> + &mTestGuid2,
> + 1,
> + TEST_VAR_2_NAME,
> + &NewEntry);
> + UT_ASSERT_NOT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> +
> + // Register the new policy.
> + Status = RegisterVariablePolicy (NewEntry);
> +
> + // Configure the stub to not care about parameters. We're testing errors.
> + expect_any_always( StubGetVariableNull, VariableName );
> + expect_any_always( StubGetVariableNull, VendorGuid );
> + expect_any_always( StubGetVariableNull, DataSize );
> +
> + // With a policy, make sure that writes still work, since the variable doesn't
> exist.
> + Data = 1;
> + will_return( StubGetVariableNull, TEST_POLICY_ATTRIBUTES_NULL ); //
> Attributes
> + will_return( StubGetVariableNull, sizeof (Data) ); // Size
> + will_return( StubGetVariableNull, &Data ); // DataPtr
> + will_return( StubGetVariableNull, EFI_SUCCESS); // Status
> +
> + Status = VariableLockRequestToLock (NULL, TEST_VAR_1_NAME,
> + &mTestGuid1); UT_ASSERT_TRUE (!EFI_ERROR (Status));
> +
> + FreePool (NewEntry);
> +
> + return UNIT_TEST_PASSED;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + Test Case that locks a variable using the Variable Policy Protocol
> +with a
> + policy other than LOCK_NOW, but variable data does not match. Then
> +attempts
> + to lock the same variable using the Variable Lock Protocol. The call
> +to
> + Variable Policy is expected to succced and the call to Variable Lock
> +is
> + expected to fail.
> +
> + @param[in] Context Unit test case context
> + **/
> +UNIT_TEST_STATUS
> +EFIAPI
> +LockingALockedVariableWithNonMatchingDataShouldFail (
> + IN UNIT_TEST_CONTEXT Context
> + )
> +{
> + EFI_STATUS Status;
> + VARIABLE_POLICY_ENTRY *NewEntry;
> + UINT8 Data;
> +
> + // Create a variable policy that locks the variable.
> + Status = CreateVarStateVariablePolicy (&mTestGuid1,
> + TEST_VAR_1_NAME,
> + TEST_POLICY_MIN_SIZE_NULL,
> + TEST_POLICY_MAX_SIZE_200,
> + TEST_POLICY_ATTRIBUTES_NULL,
> + TEST_POLICY_ATTRIBUTES_NULL,
> + &mTestGuid2,
> + 1,
> + TEST_VAR_2_NAME,
> + &NewEntry);
> + UT_ASSERT_NOT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> +
> + // Register the new policy.
> + Status = RegisterVariablePolicy (NewEntry);
> +
> + // Configure the stub to not care about parameters. We're testing errors.
> + expect_any_always( StubGetVariableNull, VariableName );
> + expect_any_always( StubGetVariableNull, VendorGuid );
> + expect_any_always( StubGetVariableNull, DataSize );
> +
> + // With a policy, make sure that writes still work, since the variable doesn't
> exist.
> + Data = 2;
> + will_return( StubGetVariableNull, TEST_POLICY_ATTRIBUTES_NULL ); //
> Attributes
> + will_return( StubGetVariableNull, sizeof (Data) ); // Size
> + will_return( StubGetVariableNull, &Data ); // DataPtr
> + will_return( StubGetVariableNull, EFI_SUCCESS); // Status
> +
> + Status = VariableLockRequestToLock (NULL, TEST_VAR_1_NAME,
> + &mTestGuid1); UT_ASSERT_TRUE (EFI_ERROR (Status));
> +
> + FreePool (NewEntry);
> +
> + return UNIT_TEST_PASSED;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + Test Case that locks a variable using Variable Lock Protocol Policy
> +Protocol
> + then and then attempts to lock the same variable using the Variable
> +Policy
> + Protocol. The call to Variable Lock is expected to succced and the
> +call to
> + Variable Policy is expected to fail.
> +
> + @param[in] Context Unit test case context
> + **/
> +UNIT_TEST_STATUS
> +EFIAPI
> +SettingPolicyForALockedVariableShouldFail (
> + IN UNIT_TEST_CONTEXT Context
> + )
> +{
> + EFI_STATUS Status;
> + VARIABLE_POLICY_ENTRY *NewEntry;
> +
> + // Lock the variable.
> + Status = VariableLockRequestToLock (NULL, TEST_VAR_1_NAME,
> + &mTestGuid1); UT_ASSERT_NOT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> +
> + // Create a variable policy that locks the variable.
> + Status = CreateVarStateVariablePolicy (&mTestGuid1,
> + TEST_VAR_1_NAME,
> + TEST_POLICY_MIN_SIZE_NULL,
> + TEST_POLICY_MAX_SIZE_200,
> + TEST_POLICY_ATTRIBUTES_NULL,
> + TEST_POLICY_ATTRIBUTES_NULL,
> + &mTestGuid2,
> + 1,
> + TEST_VAR_2_NAME,
> + &NewEntry);
> + UT_ASSERT_NOT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> +
> + // Register the new policy.
> + Status = RegisterVariablePolicy (NewEntry); UT_ASSERT_TRUE
> + (EFI_ERROR (Status));
> +
> + FreePool (NewEntry);
> +
> + return UNIT_TEST_PASSED;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + Main entry point to this unit test application.
> +
> + Sets up and runs the test suites.
> +**/
> +VOID
> +EFIAPI
> +UnitTestMain (
> + VOID
> + )
> +{
> + EFI_STATUS Status;
> + UNIT_TEST_FRAMEWORK_HANDLE Framework;
> + UNIT_TEST_SUITE_HANDLE ShimTests;
> +
> + Framework = NULL;
> +
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a v%a\n", UNIT_TEST_NAME,
> UNIT_TEST_VERSION));
> +
> + //
> + // Start setting up the test framework for running the tests.
> + //
> + Status = InitUnitTestFramework (&Framework, UNIT_TEST_NAME,
> + gEfiCallerBaseName, UNIT_TEST_VERSION); if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Failed in InitUnitTestFramework. Status
> = %r\n", Status));
> + goto EXIT;
> + }
> +
> + //
> + // Add all test suites and tests.
> + //
> + Status = CreateUnitTestSuite (
> + &ShimTests, Framework,
> + "Variable Lock Shim Tests", "VarPolicy.VarLockShim", NULL, NULL
> + );
> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Failed in CreateUnitTestSuite for
> ShimTests\n"));
> + Status = EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
> + goto EXIT;
> + }
> + AddTestCase (
> + ShimTests,
> + "Locking a variable with no matching policies should always work",
> "EmptyPolicies",
> + LockingWithoutAnyPoliciesShouldSucceed, LibInitMocked, LibCleanup,
> NULL
> + );
> + AddTestCase (
> + ShimTests,
> + "Locking a variable twice should always work", "DoubleLock",
> + LockingTwiceShouldSucceed, LibInitMocked, LibCleanup, NULL
> + );
> + AddTestCase (
> + ShimTests,
> + "Locking a variable that's already locked by another policy should work",
> "LockAfterPolicy",
> + LockingALockedVariableShouldSucceed, LibInitMocked, LibCleanup, NULL
> + );
> + AddTestCase (
> + ShimTests,
> + "Locking a variable that already has an unlocked policy should fail",
> "LockAfterUnlockedPolicy",
> + LockingAnUnlockedVariableShouldFail, LibInitMocked, LibCleanup, NULL
> + );
> + AddTestCase (
> + ShimTests,
> + "Locking a variable that already has an locked policy should succeed",
> "LockAfterLockedPolicyMatchingData",
> + LockingALockedVariableWithMatchingDataShouldSucceed, LibInitMocked,
> LibCleanup, NULL
> + );
> + AddTestCase (
> + ShimTests,
> + "Locking a variable that already has an locked policy with matching data
> should succeed", "LockAfterLockedPolicyNonMatchingData",
> + LockingALockedVariableWithNonMatchingDataShouldFail, LibInitMocked,
> LibCleanup, NULL
> + );
> + AddTestCase (
> + ShimTests,
> + "Adding a policy for a variable that has previously been locked should
> always fail", "SetPolicyAfterLock",
> + SettingPolicyForALockedVariableShouldFail, LibInitMocked, LibCleanup,
> NULL
> + );
> +
> + //
> + // Execute the tests.
> + //
> + Status = RunAllTestSuites (Framework);
> +
> +EXIT:
> + if (Framework != NULL) {
> + FreeUnitTestFramework (Framework);
> + }
> +
> + return;
> +}
> +
> +///
> +/// Avoid ECC error for function name that starts with lower case
> +letter /// #define Main main
> +
> +/**
> + Standard POSIX C entry point for host based unit test execution.
> +
> + @param[in] Argc Number of arguments
> + @param[in] Argv Array of pointers to arguments
> +
> + @retval 0 Success
> + @retval other Error
> +**/
> +INT32
> +Main (
> + IN INT32 Argc,
> + IN CHAR8 *Argv[]
> + )
> +{
> + UnitTestMain ();
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git
> a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/RuntimeDxeUnitTest/Va
> riableLockRequestToLockUnitTest.inf
> b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/RuntimeDxeUnitTest/Va
> riableLockRequestToLockUnitTest.inf
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2a659d7e1370
> --- /dev/null
> +++
> b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/RuntimeDxeUnitTest/Va
> ri
> +++ ableLockRequestToLockUnitTest.inf
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +## @file
> +# This is a host-based unit test for the VariableLockRequestToLock shim.
> +#
> +# Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation.
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent ##
> +
> +[Defines]
> + INF_VERSION = 0x00010017
> + BASE_NAME = VariableLockRequestToLockUnitTest
> + FILE_GUID = A7388B6C-7274-4717-9649-BDC5DFD1FCBE
> + VERSION_STRING = 1.0
> + MODULE_TYPE = HOST_APPLICATION
> +
> +#
> +# The following information is for reference only and not required by the
> build tools.
> +#
> +# VALID_ARCHITECTURES = IA32 X64 ARM AARCH64
> +#
> +
> +[Sources]
> + VariableLockRequestToLockUnitTest.c
> + ../VariableLockRequestToLock.c
> +
> +[Packages]
> + MdePkg/MdePkg.dec
> + MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec
> + UnitTestFrameworkPkg/UnitTestFrameworkPkg.dec
> +
> +[LibraryClasses]
> + UnitTestLib
> + DebugLib
> + VariablePolicyLib
> + VariablePolicyHelperLib
> + BaseMemoryLib
> + MemoryAllocationLib
> --
> 2.29.2.windows.2
>
>
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#68696): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/68696
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/78873160/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More information about the edk2-devel-archive
mailing list