[edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] UefiPayloadPkg: Set default PciBaseSize on Ia32

Wed Nov 11 17:51:37 UTC 2020

Hi Guo,
Thanks for the review! I have no objections against your plan. We'll rebase
our patches once it has landed in master.
Having the CI building UefiPayloadPkg would be great to prevent
regressions in the future.

Kind Regards,
Patrick Rudolph
B.Sc. Electrical Engineering
System Firmware Developer

9elements GmbH, Kortumstraße 19-21, 44787 Bochum, Germany
Email: patrick.rudolph at 9elements.com
Phone:  *+49 234 68 94 188 <+492346894188>*

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bochum
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bochum, HRB 17519
Geschäftsführung: Sebastian Deutsch, Eray Basar

Datenschutzhinweise nach Art. 13 DSGVO <https://9elements.com/privacy>

Am Di., 10. Nov. 2020 um 20:28 Uhr schrieb Dong, Guo <guo.dong at intel.com>:

>
>
> Hi Marcello,
>
>
>
> The patch passed all checks now .
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1109
>
> And I just send the patch out for code review. Please comments if you have
> question.
>
>
>
> I briefly reviewed your secureboot work, both BlSMMStoreDxe.inf and
> SecureBootEnrollDefaultKeys are DXE driver, I don’t see any dependency to
> PEI.
>
> And here is my though for the overall flow for the default key enrollment:
>
>    1. Bootloader pass the NVS variable region to UEFI payload via HOB
>       1. Bootloader might provision the default keys in variable region.
>    2. UEFI payload retrieve the variable region from HOB.
>       1. This could be done via a PlatformSupportLib instance, or add to
>       ParseLib.
>    3. UEFI payload BlSupportDxe modules could set variable related PCDs
>    if the variable HOB found.
>    4. UEFI payload FVB driver or a new driver
>    (SecureBootEnrollDefaultKeys in your case) could check if variable region
>    is initialized. UEFI payload could setup the default Keys only when the
>    variable region is not initialized. This should only happens once if the
>    bootloader doesn’t provision default keys.
>    5. Use the EDKII variable driver should work.
>
> Feel free to contact me if you want to discuss it further.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guo
>
>
>
> *From:* devel at edk2.groups.io <devel at edk2.groups.io> * On Behalf Of *Marcello
> Sylvester Bauer
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 10, 2020 6:24 AM
> *To:* Dong, Guo <guo.dong at intel.com>
> *Cc:* devel at edk2.groups.io; Ma, Maurice <maurice.ma at intel.com>;
> patrick.rudolph at 9elements.com; You, Benjamin <benjamin.you at intel.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] UefiPayloadPkg: Set default
> PciBaseSize on Ia32
>
>
>
> Hi Guo,
>
>
>
> > Removing the PEI phase could simplify the UEFI payload, the PEI FV will
> be replaced by a single UefiPayloadEntry module which only does minimal
> work and passes control to DXE core. So we don’t need have a PEI core and
> other PEI modules in UEFI payload. It would reduce payload size and improve
> the boot performance.
>
>
>
> Okay, this makes very much sense. Is there an approximate estimate of when
> it will be finished? It would be great if we could still merge this patch
> anyway somehow.
>
>
>
> > I don’t know how your upcoming patches and your secureboot works in UEFI
> payload PEI. I could take a look and give comments if you have the change
> list.
>
> It is still WIP but could be adapted:
> https://github.com/9elements/edk2/tree/feature/secureboot
>
> Thanks,
> Marcello
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 5:14 AM Dong, Guo <guo.dong at intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Marcello,
>
>
>
> Removing the PEI phase could simplify the UEFI payload, the PEI FV will be
> replaced by a single UefiPayloadEntry module which only does minimal work
> and passes control to DXE core. So we don’t need have a PEI core and other
> PEI modules in UEFI payload. It would reduce payload size and improve the
> boot performance.
>
>
>
> I don’t know how your upcoming patches and your secureboot works in UEFI
> payload PEI. I could take a look and give comments if you have the change
> list.
>
>
>
> Thank you to point out the failure. I will update the patch and create a
> PR.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guo
>
>
>
> *From:* Marcello Sylvester Bauer <marcello.bauer at 9elements.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, November 9, 2020 3:47 AM
> *To:* Dong, Guo <guo.dong at intel.com>
> *Cc:* devel at edk2.groups.io; Ma, Maurice <maurice.ma at intel.com>;
> patrick.rudolph at 9elements.com; You, Benjamin <benjamin.you at intel.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] UefiPayloadPkg: Set default
> PciBaseSize on Ia32
>
>
>
> Hi Guo,
>
>
>
> Sounds good to remove the IA32 target and stick to a single DSC file.
> However, Is there an advantage to remove the PEI phase? It breaks many of
> our upcoming patches, which currently rely on the PEI phase (e.g.
> SecureBoot support).
>
> In addition to the failed PatchCheck, it does not build on Linux gcc:
> https://github.com/9elements/edk2/runs/1373473040
>
> thanks,
> Marcello
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:36 AM Dong, Guo <guo.dong at intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Marcello,
>
>
>
> It looks there is issue for the CI tool to complete all the checks. So I
> just closed this PR.
>
>
>
> And I just created another PR https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1046
> to remove PEI phase from UEFI payload.
>
> If the new patch is approved, we don’t need this patch to update DSC file.
>
> In the new patch, UEFI payload would use a single DSC file to support X64,
> IA32X64 and possibly IA32 build.
>
> Please have a look at that PR and let me know if you have any comments.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guo
>
>
>
> *From:* devel at edk2.groups.io <devel at edk2.groups.io> *On Behalf Of *Guo
> Dong
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 22, 2020 7:49 PM
> *To:* Marcello Sylvester Bauer <marcello.bauer at 9elements.com>; Ma,
> Maurice <maurice.ma at intel.com>
> *Cc:* devel at edk2.groups.io; patrick.rudolph at 9elements.com; You, Benjamin <
> benjamin.you at intel.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] UefiPayloadPkg: Set default
> PciBaseSize on Ia32
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Marcello,
>
>
>
> Sorry for late response. I created a pull request
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1044 to merge this patch 2 hours
> ago.
>
> Hopefully it could be merged soon after all the checks.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guo
>
>
>
> *From:* Marcello Sylvester Bauer <marcello.bauer at 9elements.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 22, 2020 1:25 AM
> *To:* Ma, Maurice <maurice.ma at intel.com>
> *Cc:* devel at edk2.groups.io; patrick.rudolph at 9elements.com; Dong, Guo <
> guo.dong at intel.com>; You, Benjamin <benjamin.you at intel.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] UefiPayloadPkg: Set default PciBaseSize on
> Ia32
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> As already mentioned, this patch fixes the current master build for the
> UefiPayloadPkgIa32 platform.
> Is it possible to merge this change soon?
>
>
>
> Sorry for the circumstances.
>
>
> thanks,
> Marcello
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 9:02 PM Ma, Maurice <maurice.ma at intel.com> wrote:
>
> Reviewed-by:
> Maurice Ma <maurice.ma at intel.com>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <marcello.bauer at 9elements.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 6:34
> > To: devel at edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <marcello.bauer at 9elements.com>;
> > patrick.rudolph at 9elements.com; Ma, Maurice <maurice.ma at intel.com>; Dong,
> > Guo <guo.dong at intel.com>; You, Benjamin <benjamin.you at intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 0/1] UefiPayloadPkg: Set default PciBaseSize on Ia32
> >
> > This commit fix UefiPayloadPkgIa32 build in master.
> >
> > In commit 8028b2907e20b21cd7d69639a36ac82a77c81dc1 I did forget to set
> > the default value for PcdPciExpressBaseSize on Ia32 Targets. This patch
> does
> > insert it afterwards. It would be great if it could be merged asap.
> >
> > PS: I added the Ia32 target to our CI to avoid this issue in future.
> Sorry for the
> > misfortune.
> >
> > v2:
> >   * Remove no longer required build-time PcdPciExpressBaseAddress
> >
> > Branch: https://github.com/9elements/edk2/tree/fix/UefiPayloadPkgIa32_V2
> > PR:     https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/1008
> >
> > Marcello Sylvester Bauer (1):
> >   UefiPayloadPkg: Set default PciBaseSize on Ia32
> >
> >  UefiPayloadPkg/UefiPayloadPkgIa32.dsc | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.28.0
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *[Marcello Sylvester Bauer]*
>
>
>
> 9elements Agency GmbH, Kortumstraße 19-21, 44787 Bochum, Germany
>
> Email:  [DEINE EMAIL ADDRESSE]
> <https://static.9elements.com/email_signatur.html>
>
> Phone:  +49 234 68 94 188 <+492346894188>
>
> Mobile:  +49 1722847618 <+491722847618>
>
>
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bochum
>
> Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bochum, HRB 17519
>
> Geschäftsführung: Sebastian Deutsch, Eray Basar
>
>
> Datenschutzhinweise nach Art. 13 DSGVO <https://9elements.com/privacy>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *[Marcello Sylvester Bauer]*
>
>
>
> 9elements Agency GmbH, Kortumstraße 19-21, 44787 Bochum, Germany
>
> Email:  [DEINE EMAIL ADDRESSE]
> <https://static.9elements.com/email_signatur.html>
>
> Phone:  +49 234 68 94 188 <+492346894188>
>
> Mobile:  +49 1722847618 <+491722847618>
>
>
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bochum
>
> Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bochum, HRB 17519
>
> Geschäftsführung: Sebastian Deutsch, Eray Basar
>
>
> Datenschutzhinweise nach Art. 13 DSGVO <https://9elements.com/privacy>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *[Marcello Sylvester Bauer]*
>
>
>
> 9elements Agency GmbH, Kortumstraße 19-21, 44787 Bochum, Germany
>
> Email:  [DEINE EMAIL ADDRESSE]
> <https://static.9elements.com/email_signatur.html>
>
> Phone:  +49 234 68 94 188 <+492346894188>
>
> Mobile:  +49 1722847618 <+491722847618>
>
>
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bochum
>
> Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bochum, HRB 17519
>
> Geschäftsführung: Sebastian Deutsch, Eray Basar
>
>
> Datenschutzhinweise nach Art. 13 DSGVO <https://9elements.com/privacy>
>
> 
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#67325): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/67325
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/77482867/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/edk2-devel-archive/attachments/20201111/1bf15719/attachment.htm>