[edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/2] CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Add native instruction support for X64

Zurcher, Christopher J christopher.j.zurcher at intel.com
Fri Nov 13 01:22:24 UTC 2020


Sorry for the thrash on this; in testing the GCC build with .S files, I found that there is still a build failure due to the inclusion of a "common" data section in the OpenSSL code, which is explicitly removed by Base Tools changes in commit 214a3b79417f. So I think without removing this restriction or changing OpenSSL in a future patch, we will not be able to build the accelerated functions for GCC.

Thanks,
Christopher Zurcher

> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel at edk2.groups.io <devel at edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 11:09
> To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao at intel.com>; Zurcher, Christopher J
> <christopher.j.zurcher at intel.com>
> Cc: devel at edk2.groups.io; gaoliming <gaoliming at byosoft.com.cn>; Wang, Jian J
> <jian.j.wang at intel.com>; Lu, XiaoyuX <xiaoyux.lu at intel.com>; Kinney, Michael
> D <michael.d.kinney at intel.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel at arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/2] CryptoPkg/OpensslLib: Add native
> instruction support for X64
> 
> On 11/11/20 03:19, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
> > I full agree with long term plan. E.g. we need remove ApiHook.c as well.
> >
> > I more concern about the short term plan, if you want to check in this and
> get the capability.
> >
> > I think we need this capability for GCC tool chain as well, so I am OK to
> check in .S.
> > This is auto generated. I do not think it is a step back.
> >
> > We can remove them together with ApiHook later, in the long term.
> 
> Agreed on all counts.
> 
> Laszlo
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#67413): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/67413
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/78017396/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-






More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list