[edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 1/1] UefiCpuPkg: PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Not to Change Bitwidth During Static Paging

[Laszlo Ersek]

On 04/14/21 04:59, Kun Qin wrote:
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3300
> 
> Current implementation of SetStaticPageTable routine in PiSmmCpuDxeSmm
> driver will check a global variable mPhysicalAddressBits, and eventually
> cap any value larger than 39 at 39.
> 
> This global variable is used in ConvertMemoryPageAttributes, which backs
> SmmSetMemoryAttributes and SmmClearMemoryAttributes. Thus for a processor
> that supports more than 39 bits width, trying to mark page table regions
> higher than 39-bit will always return EFI_UNSUPPROTED.
> 
> This change replaced the changed bitwidth to a stack based variable.

(1) "local variable" is a more common expression.

If we wanted to be exact, we could call it "variable with automatic
storage duration".

Either way, "stack" is irrelevant here, IMO.

> 
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong at intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni at intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek at redhat.com>
> Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar at intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kun Qin <kuqin12 at gmail.com>
> ---
>  UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c | 25 +++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

(2) I suggest adding the following line to the commit message, just
above your Signed-off-by:

Fixes: 4eee0cc7cc0db74489b99c19eba056b53eda6358

Because the issue is a regression from that commit.

> 
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
> index 6902584b1fbd..0caee8a27abe 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/PageTbl.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ SetStaticPageTable (
>    UINTN                                         IndexOfPml4Entries;
>    UINTN                                         IndexOfPdpEntries;
>    UINTN                                         IndexOfPageDirectoryEntries;
> +  UINT64                                        PhysicalAddressBits;
>    UINT64                                        *PageMapLevel5Entry;
>    UINT64                                        *PageMapLevel4Entry;
>    UINT64                                        *PageMap;

(3) The "mPhysicalAddressBits" global variable has type UINT8. I don't
see a reason for introducing the "PhysicalAddressBits" local variable
with a different type.

The rest looks good to me.

Thanks
Laszlo


> @@ -237,26 +238,28 @@ SetStaticPageTable (
>    // IA-32e paging translates 48-bit linear addresses to 52-bit physical addresses
>    //  when 5-Level Paging is disabled.
>    //
> -  ASSERT (mPhysicalAddressBits <= 52);
> -  if (!m5LevelPagingNeeded && mPhysicalAddressBits > 48) {
> -    mPhysicalAddressBits = 48;
> +  PhysicalAddressBits = mPhysicalAddressBits;
> +
> +  ASSERT (PhysicalAddressBits <= 52);
> +  if (!m5LevelPagingNeeded && PhysicalAddressBits > 48) {
> +    PhysicalAddressBits = 48;
>    }
>  
>    NumberOfPml5EntriesNeeded = 1;
> -  if (mPhysicalAddressBits > 48) {
> -    NumberOfPml5EntriesNeeded = (UINTN) LShiftU64 (1, mPhysicalAddressBits - 48);
> -    mPhysicalAddressBits = 48;
> +  if (PhysicalAddressBits > 48) {
> +    NumberOfPml5EntriesNeeded = (UINTN) LShiftU64 (1, PhysicalAddressBits - 48);
> +    PhysicalAddressBits = 48;
>    }
>  
>    NumberOfPml4EntriesNeeded = 1;
> -  if (mPhysicalAddressBits > 39) {
> -    NumberOfPml4EntriesNeeded = (UINTN) LShiftU64 (1, mPhysicalAddressBits - 39);
> -    mPhysicalAddressBits = 39;
> +  if (PhysicalAddressBits > 39) {
> +    NumberOfPml4EntriesNeeded = (UINTN) LShiftU64 (1, PhysicalAddressBits - 39);
> +    PhysicalAddressBits = 39;
>    }
>  
>    NumberOfPdpEntriesNeeded = 1;
> -  ASSERT (mPhysicalAddressBits > 30);
> -  NumberOfPdpEntriesNeeded = (UINTN) LShiftU64 (1, mPhysicalAddressBits - 30);
> +  ASSERT (PhysicalAddressBits > 30);
> +  NumberOfPdpEntriesNeeded = (UINTN) LShiftU64 (1, PhysicalAddressBits - 30);
>  
>    //
>    // By architecture only one PageMapLevel4 exists - so lets allocate storage for it.
> 



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#74092): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/74092
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/82082904/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-