[edk2-devel] Is there any use case of FirmwarePerformanceStandaloneMm.inf now?

[Dandan Bi]

Hi Kun,

Thank you for the information.

Yes, the idea is to centralize the SMM performance report collection job to SmmCorePerformanceLib, and DxeCorePerformanceLib could communicate with SmmCorePerformanceLib for all SMM performance data rather than through FirmwarePerformance**Mm driver.
But we will not remove FirmwarePerformance**Mm driver,  just remove the code logic related to **MM performance data which will be covered by **mmCorePerformanceLib.
FirmwarePerformance**Mm driver will still collect some performance data in S3 like the S3SuspendStart, S3SuspendEnd.  We don't introduce any incompatible change.

If now StandaloneMm Core does not report performance data to FirmwarePerformanceStandaloneMm module, I think it should be ok to remove the handling of **MM performance data both in FirmwarePerformanceSmm and FirmwarePerformanceStandaloneMm now.
For SMM, the removed logic will be handled by SmmCorePerformanceLib
For StandaloneMm, I think we can submit an Edk2 feature to add a StandaloneMmCore instance with the same functionality of SmmCorePerformanceLib. As now the functionality of collecting StandaloneMm performance data is missing in Edk2.
 


Thanks,	
Dandan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kun Qin <kuqin12 at gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 6, 2021 6:49 AM
> To: devel at edk2.groups.io; Bi, Dandan <dandan.bi at intel.com>;
> kun.q at outlook.com
> Cc: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu at intel.com>; Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang at intel.com>;
> gaoliming <gaoliming at byosoft.com.cn>; Yao, Jiewen
> <jiewen.yao at intel.com>; Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew at microsoft.com>;
> 'Sean Brogan' <sean.brogan at microsoft.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Is there any use case of
> FirmwarePerformanceStandaloneMm.inf now?
> 
> Hi Dandan,
> 
> Thanks for letting me know. I added Bret and Sean to the thread for broader
> view in our scope.
> 
> But currently our StandaloneMm Core does not report performance data to
> FirmwarePerformanceStandaloneMm module.
> 
> Is the idea to centralize the performance report collection job to
> SmmCorePerformanceLib and remove the FirmwarePerformance**Mm
> driver? Is there any plan to support a Standalone instance once the
> traditional MM version is functional?
> 
> Thanks,
> Kun
> 
> 
> On 08/05/2021 04:44, Dandan Bi wrote:
> > Hi Kun,
> >
> > I plan to make some change for FirmwarePerformanceSmm.inf, may also
> > update the behavior of FirmwarePerformanceStandaloneMm.inf as they
> are
> > sharing codes now.
> >
> > And I saw you are the submitter of this driver. Could you help clarify
> > following questions ? Thanks in advance.
> >
> >  1. Do you have the use case to leverage
> >     FirmwarePerformanceStandaloneMm.inf to collect Standalone MM
> >     performance data now?
> >  2. Do you have any Library/module used by StandaloneMmCore to collect
> >     Standalone MM performance data and report the data to
> >     FirmwarePerformanceStandaloneMm like the SmmCorePerformanceLib
> used
> >     for SMM core?
> >  3. I plan to move some logic from FirmwarePerformanceDataTableSmm to
> >     SmmCorePerformanceLib as below. Do you think is it ok just to remove
> >     them from FirmwarePerformanceStandaloneMm.inf now?
> >
> > If there is not any module to report Standalone MM performance data to
> > FirmwarePerformanceStandaloneMm.inf, I think it should be OK to remove
> > them from FirmwarePerformanceStandaloneMm now.
> >
> > Change:
> >
> > SMM performance data collection now:
> >
> >  1. SmmCorePerformanceLib collect all the performance data in SMM and
> >     report the data to FirmwarePerformanceDataTableSmm through status
> >     code. **
> >  2. DxeCorePerformanceLib will communicate with
> >     FirmwarePerformanceDataTableSmm to get the SMM performance data
> and
> >     allocate performance table to store all the performance data.
> >
> > Now I want to simplify the process to make DxeCorePerformanceLib
> > communicate with SmmCorePerformanceLib directly to collect SMM
> > performance data, so FirmwarePerformanceDataTableSmm don't need to
> get
> > the SMM performance data from SmmCorePerformanceLib and register
> SMI
> > handler for the communication with DxeCorePerformanceLib.
> >
> > For FirmwarePerformanceStandaloneMm.inf, just remove this logic if
> > there is no module to prepare MM performance data to it now.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dandan
> >
> > 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#78776): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/78776
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/84682596/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-