[edk2-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/7] OVMF: Disable the TPM2 platform hierarchy

Yao, Jiewen jiewen.yao at intel.com
Sun Aug 8 00:54:51 UTC 2021


Thanks for the clarification.
Comments below:


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb at linux.ibm.com>
> Sent: Saturday, August 7, 2021 11:04 PM
> To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao at intel.com>; Stefan Berger
> <stefanb at linux.vnet.ibm.com>; devel at edk2.groups.io
> Cc: marcandre.lureau at redhat.com; lersek at redhat.com;
> dick_wilkins at phoenix.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] OVMF: Disable the TPM2 platform hierarchy
> 
> 
> On 8/7/21 2:00 AM, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
> > Hi Stefan
> > It seems this patch series is not a production fix. It is more like a prototype, my
> personally feeling.]
> 
> Yes, it's an RFC patch and with the struggles as pointed out below. I
> don't know how this project would go about importing code from
> 'edk2-platforms' for example, what deviations from the original code in
> edk2-platforms you are willing to accept and what not, such as removing
> dependencies from the original code and commenting out code that doesn't
> work anymore due the removal. What I imported looked like it had a
> dependency on 'MinPlatformPkg/MinPlatformPkg.dec'. Do we need to import
> this package first or rather not?

[Jiewen]
If you want to move a feature from EDKII-platform to EDKII, you must remove the dependency on EDKII-platform.
And there are lots of ways on how to remove dependency.

For example, you can define the PCD in EDKII directly. As such, you don’t need depend upon MinPlatformPkg.



> >
> > A common issue in patch 2, 3, 4, 5, is that using "comment" to remove the
> code. Please remove the unnecessary code directly without // or /**/ in C, and #
> in INF.
> >
> > For patch 1, if you want to move the code to SecurityPkg, that is fine. Please
> move the whole driver their and you should not remove and code by comment.
> Please fix the issue to make it pass build, instead of commenting the code like
> work-around.
> 
> 
> What is the 'whole driver'? Can you be a bit more specific what all
> files are comprising the 'whole driver.'
> 
> 
> > Otherwise, you may copy the module to OvmfPkg. Then you can modify it as
> you need.
> 
> What is the 'module' versus the 'whole driver?'

[Jiewen] Sorry, I don’t mean to confuse you.
Usually, Driver means a UEFI/PI driver. Module means a driver or a library.
But a code may be built as a driver or a library, some people treat them as same thing. 
So they are same thing in this context.

> 
> And in the end, how would 'you' go about this in this case?

[Jiewen] I have two options in my mind.
Option 1: We move the Tpm2PlatformHierachy support from EDKII-platform to EDKII/SecurityPkg.
The move action can take 2 steps:
A) To 'create' the same Tpm2PlatformHierachy modules in SecurityPkg.
B) To 'remove' the Tpm2PlatformHierachy modules in EDKII-platform.

The modules refer to Tcg2PlatformPei/ Tcg2PlatformDxe / PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib in
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-platforms/tree/master/Platform/Intel/MinPlatformPkg/Tcg

'Create' means you don’t need use 'move/modify' approach to introduce a broken patch with MinPlatformPkg then fix it in the second patch. You just need create one workable patch.

However, since this impacts the EDKII core component, we need more time to review.


Option 2: We create the Tpm2PlatformHiearchy support in OvmfPkg directly.
This only takes 1 step:
A) To 'create' the Tpm2PlatformHierachy modules in OvmfPkg.
You cannot touch Tpm2PlatformHierachy modules in EDKII-platform.

This only impacts OvmfPkg. So you can make necessary change for virtual platform without considering the requirement in physical platform.

Thank you
Yao Jiewen

> 
> 
> >
> > Please also merge 2, 3, 4 into 1. I don’t think we want a broken patch in 1,
> then add fix in 2, 3, 4.
> >
> > Thank you
> > Yao Jiewen
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> Sent: Friday, August 6, 2021 11:33 PM
> >> To: devel at edk2.groups.io; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao at intel.com>
> >> Cc: marcandre.lureau at redhat.com; lersek at redhat.com;
> >> dick_wilkins at phoenix.com; Stefan Berger <stefanb at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/7] OVMF: Disable the TPM2 platform hierarchy
> >>
> >> This series imports code from the edk2-platforms project related to
> >> changing the password of the TPM2 platform hierarchy and uses it to
> >> disable the TPM2 platform hierarchy in OVMF. It addresses the OVMF
> >> aspects of the following bugs:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3510
> >> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3499
> >>
> >> There's no doubt that my struggles with the build system and handling
> >> of dependencies are visible in this series. Quite a few aspects of
> >> getting things right are more or less guesswork and I am often not sure
> >> what the correct way of doing things are. If 'you' wanted to fix
> >> things up and repost it, please go ahead...
> >>
> >> Stefan
> >>
> >> Stefan Berger (7):
> >>    SecurityPkg/TPM: Import PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib.c from
> >>      edk2-platforms
> >>    SecruityPkg/TPM: Disable dependency on MinPlatformPkg
> >>    SecurityPkg/TPM: Disable PcdGetBool (PcdRandomizePlatformHierarchy)
> >>    SecurityPkg/TPM: Disable a Pcd
> >>    SecurityPkg/TPM: Add a NULL implementation of
> >>      PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib
> >>    OVMF: Reference new classes in the build system for compilation
> >>    OVMF: Disable the TPM2 platform hierarchy
> >>
> >>   OvmfPkg/AmdSev/AmdSevX64.dsc                  |   3 +
> >>   .../PlatformBootManagerLib/BdsPlatform.c      |   6 +
> >>   .../PlatformBootManagerLib.inf                |   1 +
> >>   .../PlatformBootManagerLibBhyve/BdsPlatform.c |   6 +
> >>   .../PlatformBootManagerLibGrub/BdsPlatform.c  |   6 +
> >>   OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32.dsc                       |   3 +
> >>   OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgIa32X64.dsc                    |   3 +
> >>   OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc                        |   3 +
> >>   .../Include/Library/TpmPlatformHierarchyLib.h |  27 ++
> >>   .../PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib.c           | 266 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>   .../PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib.inf         |  46 +++
> >>   .../PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib.c           |  23 ++
> >>   .../PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib.inf         |  39 +++
> >>   13 files changed, 432 insertions(+)
> >>   create mode 100644
> SecurityPkg/Include/Library/TpmPlatformHierarchyLib.h
> >>   create mode 100644
> >>
> SecurityPkg/Library/PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib/PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierar
> >> chyLib.c
> >>   create mode 100644
> >>
> SecurityPkg/Library/PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLib/PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierar
> >> chyLib.inf
> >>   create mode 100644
> >>
> SecurityPkg/Library/PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLibNull/PeiDxeTpmPlatformHi
> >> erarchyLib.c
> >>   create mode 100644
> >>
> SecurityPkg/Library/PeiDxeTpmPlatformHierarchyLibNull/PeiDxeTpmPlatformHi
> >> erarchyLib.inf
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.31.1


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#78865): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/78865
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/84712022/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-






More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list