[edk2-rfc] [edk2-devel] RFC: design review for TDVF in OVMF
Michael Brown
mcb30 at ipxe.org
Fri Jun 4 10:43:03 UTC 2021
On 04/06/2021 11:11, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> And, to reiterate, just because Confidential Computing is the
> new hot thing, the use cases for OvmfPkgIa32, OvmfPkgIa32X64, OvmfPkgX64
> do not disappear. Regressing them, or making them unmaintainable due to
> skyrocketing complexity, is not acceptable.
Totally agree with this. Confidential Computing is a very niche use
case, and there is no justification for exploding the complexity of the
standard OVMF build.
If, several years from now, it ever reaches the point that the majority
of real-world workloads are using TDX, then there would be an argument
that the complexity cost has to be paid and that the standard OVMF build
should include TDX features. But that's several years away and may
never happen.
Michael
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#76068): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/76068
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/83283616/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More information about the edk2-devel-archive
mailing list