回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/8] Measured SEV boot with kernel/initrd/cmdline

[gaoliming]

Dov:
  Can you submit one BZ for this new feature? I will add it into edk2 202108 stable tag planning. 

Thanks
Liming
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: devel at edk2.groups.io <devel at edk2.groups.io> 代表 Laszlo Ersek
> 发送时间: 2021年6月9日 21:54
> 收件人: Dov Murik <dovmurik at linux.ibm.com>; devel at edk2.groups.io; Ard
> Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore at kernel.org>
> 抄送: Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin at linux.ibm.com>; Tobin
> Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin at ibm.com>; Jim Cadden <jcadden at ibm.com>;
> James Bottomley <jejb at linux.ibm.com>; Hubertus Franke
> <frankeh at us.ibm.com>; Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen at intel.com>; Ashish
> Kalra <ashish.kalra at amd.com>; Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh at amd.com>;
> Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas at google.com>; Jiewen Yao
> <jiewen.yao at intel.com>; Min Xu <min.m.xu at intel.com>; Tom Lendacky
> <thomas.lendacky at amd.com>
> 主题: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/8] Measured SEV boot with
> kernel/initrd/cmdline
> 
> On 06/09/21 14:25, Dov Murik wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 08/06/2021 18:59, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> On 06/08/21 14:09, Dov Murik wrote:
> >>> On 08/06/2021 13:59, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >>>> On 06/08/21 11:57, Dov Murik wrote:
> >>
> >
> >>>
> >>> But if we go with (1) -- do you (and Ard) prefer:
> >>>
> >>> (a) leave X86QemuLoadImageLib as it is in master;
> >>>
> >>> -or-
> >>>
> >>> (b) modify X86QemuLoadImageLib the "main" path to use the
> >>> QemuKernelLoaderFs (what I started doing) and leave the "legacy" path
> >>> with QemuFwCfg
> >>>
> >>> ?
> >>
> >> I prefer option (a), with the extension that we need to update the
> >> following file-top comment in the files under
> >> "OvmfPkg/Library/X86QemuLoadImageLib":
> >>
> >>   X86 specific implementation of QemuLoadImageLib library class
> interface
> >>   with support for loading mixed mode images and non-EFI stub images
> >>
> >
> > First attempt at this is submitted to the mailing list:
> > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/76265
> >
> >
> >> We should add a warning there that this library instance (a) depends on
> >> fw_cfg directly, and (b) is therefore unsuitable for blob verification
> >> purposes.
> >
> > I'll add the warning (b) when I add the blob verification feature.
> 
> That makes sense to me, thanks.
> Laszlo
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#76322): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/76322
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/83440567/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-