[edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 5/5] StandaloneMmPkg: build for 32bit arm machines

[Etienne Carriere]

Hello Sami,

Thanks for the catch. I missed that. My comment below.

On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 13:07, Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar at arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Etienne,
>
> Please find my response inline marked [SAMI].
>
> Regards,
>
> Sami Mujawar
>
> On 17/05/2021 08:40 AM, Etienne Carriere wrote:
> > This change allows to build StandaloneMmPkg components for 32bit Arm
> > StandaloneMm firmware.
> >
> > This change mainly moves AArch64/ source files to Arm/ side directory
> > for several components:  StandaloneMmCpu, StandaloneMmCoreEntryPoint
> > and StandaloneMmMemLib. The source file is built for both 32b and 64b
> > Arm targets.
> > (snip)
> > --- a/StandaloneMmPkg/StandaloneMmPkg.dsc
> > +++ b/StandaloneMmPkg/StandaloneMmPkg.dsc
> > (snip)
> > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
> >   #                        module style (EDK or EDKII) specified in [Components] section.
> >   #
> >   ###################################################################################################
> > -[BuildOptions.AARCH64]
> > +[BuildOptions.AARCH64, BuildOptions.ARM]
> >   GCC:*_*_*_DLINK_FLAGS = -z common-page-size=0x1000 -march=armv8-a+nofp -mstrict-align
> [SAMI] Looks like I missed this in my previous review, sorry.
> Is '-march=armv8-axxx' correct here? or we need another ARM section with
> -march=armv7-a?
> Can you also check if '-mstrict-align' is right and if
> '-fno-stack-protector' is needed instead, please?
>
> I used the following setting from your edk2-platforms patch v1 4/4, file
> Platform/StandaloneMm/PlatformStandaloneMmPkg/PlatformStandaloneMmRpmb.dsc
> and was able to build on a Windows host PC using
> gcc-arm-9.2-2019.12-mingw-w64-i686-arm-none-eabi compiler.
>          [BuildOptions.ARM]
>          GCC:*_*_*_DLINK_FLAGS = -z common-page-size=0x1000 -march=armv7-a
>          GCC:*_*_*_CC_FLAGS = -fno-stack-protector
> [/SAMI]

You are right.
I saw that I build with these same directive but inherited from my
edk2-platforms platform that override these.
Indeed BuildOptions.ARM must be updated.
I am preparing a patch v4 series.

Regards,
Etienne


> >   GCC:*_*_*_CC_FLAGS = -mstrict-align
> >
>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#75347): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/75347
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/82881519/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-