[edk2-devel] [PATCH] Add support for RISCV GOT/PLT relocations
Sunil V L
sunilvl at ventanamicro.com
Fri May 28 06:56:41 UTC 2021
Thanks Daniel. Response below.
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:24:14AM +0800, Daniel Schaefer wrote:
> +Maintainers and Reviewers of BaseTools
>
> See my reply below.
>
> On 5/27/21 10:41 PM, Sunil V L wrote:
> > Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3096
> >
> > This patch adds support for R_RISCV_CALL_PLT and R_RISCV_GOT_HI20
> > relocations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl at ventanamicro.com>
> > Cc: Abner Chang <abner.chang at hpe.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer at hpe.com>
> > Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de>
> > ---
> > BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c
> > index d097db8632..d05dcf9992 100644
> > --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c
> > +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/GenFw/Elf64Convert.c
> > @@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ STATIC UINT32 mDebugOffset;
> > STATIC UINT8 *mRiscVPass1Targ = NULL;
> > STATIC Elf_Shdr *mRiscVPass1Sym = NULL;
> > STATIC Elf64_Half mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex = 0;
> > +STATIC INT32 mRiscVPass1Offset;
> > +STATIC INT32 mRiscVPass1GotFixup;
> > //
> > // Initialization Function
> > @@ -479,11 +481,11 @@ WriteSectionRiscV64 (
> > break;
> > case R_RISCV_32:
> > - *(UINT32 *)Targ = (UINT32)((UINT64)(*(UINT32 *)Targ) - SymShdr->sh_addr + mCoffSectionsOffset[Sym->st_shndx]);
> > + *(UINT64 *)Targ = Sym->st_value + Rel->r_addend;
> > break;
> > case R_RISCV_64:
> > - *(UINT64 *)Targ = *(UINT64 *)Targ - SymShdr->sh_addr + mCoffSectionsOffset[Sym->st_shndx];
> > + *(UINT64 *)Targ = Sym->st_value + Rel->r_addend;
> > break;
> > case R_RISCV_HI20:
> > @@ -533,6 +535,18 @@ WriteSectionRiscV64 (
> > mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex = 0;
> > break;
> > + case R_RISCV_GOT_HI20:
> > + Value = (Sym->st_value - Rel->r_offset);
> > + mRiscVPass1Offset = RV_X(Value, 0, 12);
> > + Value = RV_X(Value, 12, 20);
> > + *(UINT32 *)Targ = (Value << 12) | (RV_X(*(UINT32*)Targ, 0, 12));
> > +
> > + mRiscVPass1Targ = Targ;
> > + mRiscVPass1Sym = SymShdr;
> > + mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex = Sym->st_shndx;
> > + mRiscVPass1GotFixup = 1;
> > + break;
> > +
> > case R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20:
> > mRiscVPass1Targ = Targ;
> > mRiscVPass1Sym = SymShdr;
> > @@ -545,11 +559,17 @@ WriteSectionRiscV64 (
> > if (mRiscVPass1Targ != NULL && mRiscVPass1Sym != NULL && mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex != 0) {
> > int i;
> > Value2 = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 12, 20));
> > - Value = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 20, 12));
> > - if(Value & (RISCV_IMM_REACH/2)) {
> > - Value |= ~(RISCV_IMM_REACH-1);
> > +
> > + if(mRiscVPass1GotFixup) {
> > + Value = (UINT32)(mRiscVPass1Offset);
> > + } else {
> > + Value = (UINT32)(RV_X(*(UINT32 *)Targ, 20, 12));
> > + if(Value & (RISCV_IMM_REACH/2)) {
> > + Value |= ~(RISCV_IMM_REACH-1);
> > + }
> > }
> > Value = Value - (UINT32)mRiscVPass1Sym->sh_addr + mCoffSectionsOffset[mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex];
> > +
> > if(-2048 > (INT32)Value) {
> > i = (((INT32)Value * -1) / 4096);
> > Value2 -= i;
> > @@ -569,12 +589,22 @@ WriteSectionRiscV64 (
> > }
> > }
> > - *(UINT32 *)Targ = (RV_X(Value, 0, 12) << 20) | (RV_X(*(UINT32*)Targ, 0, 20));
> > + if(mRiscVPass1GotFixup) {
> > + *(UINT32 *)Targ = (RV_X((UINT32)Value, 0, 12) << 20)
> > + | (RV_X(*(UINT32*)Targ, 0, 20));
> > + /* Convert LD instruction to ADDI */
> > + *(UINT32 *)Targ = ((*(UINT32 *)Targ & ~0x707f) | 0x13);
> > + }
> > + else {
>
> else should be on the line before, like } else {
Sure. Will fix it and send next version of patch.
>
> > + *(UINT32 *)Targ = (RV_X(Value, 0, 12) << 20) | (RV_X(*(UINT32*)Targ, 0, 20));
> > + }
> > *(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ = (RV_X(Value2, 0, 20)<<12) | (RV_X(*(UINT32 *)mRiscVPass1Targ, 0, 12));
> > }
> > mRiscVPass1Sym = NULL;
> > mRiscVPass1Targ = NULL;
> > mRiscVPass1SymSecIndex = 0;
> > + mRiscVPass1Offset = 0;
> > + mRiscVPass1GotFixup = 0;
> > break;
> > case R_RISCV_ADD64:
> > @@ -586,6 +616,7 @@ WriteSectionRiscV64 (
> > case R_RISCV_GPREL_I:
> > case R_RISCV_GPREL_S:
> > case R_RISCV_CALL:
> > + case R_RISCV_CALL_PLT:
> > case R_RISCV_RVC_BRANCH:
> > case R_RISCV_RVC_JUMP:
> > case R_RISCV_RELAX:
> > @@ -1528,6 +1559,7 @@ WriteRelocations64 (
> > case R_RISCV_GPREL_I:
> > case R_RISCV_GPREL_S:
> > case R_RISCV_CALL:
> > + case R_RISCV_CALL_PLT:
> > case R_RISCV_RVC_BRANCH:
> > case R_RISCV_RVC_JUMP:
> > case R_RISCV_RELAX:
> > @@ -1537,6 +1569,7 @@ WriteRelocations64 (
> > case R_RISCV_SET16:
> > case R_RISCV_SET32:
> > case R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20:
> > + case R_RISCV_GOT_HI20:
> > case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I:
> > break;
> >
>
> Just one minor nit-pick on the formatting.
> Well in my email program the indentation is off, it looks fine on GitHub
> though. Probably an issue with the displaying on my end.
> https://github.com/vlsunil/riscv-edk2/commit/a742fab0d73ab568aa2d2578a5ccfc400ffd2fa5
>
I don't see an issue with formatting with either my mail client or
github.
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer at hpe.com>
>
Thanks!
Sunil
> Tested with GCC 8.3.0 on Debian Buster.
> Can boot -machine sifive_u to UEFI Shell and -machine virt on QEMU to Linux
> shell.
>
> Sunil tested to compile on GCC 10.2.0 on Debian Buster - don't know if he
> booted.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#75832): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/75832
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/83140397/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More information about the edk2-devel-archive
mailing list