Relationship to existing 3rd party repos/CentOS/SL?
Mike McGrath
mmcgrath at redhat.com
Sat Apr 14 17:36:07 UTC 2007
Axel Thimm wrote:
> What you are implying, is that your voting was effectively shooting
> down cooperation and coexistance with other 3rd parties. I'm sure
> other people that voted like you have a different interpretation of
> their vote, at least I hope so.
>
> But at the very least this requires the clarification I asked for. Did
> the other 4 people that voted against it also vote against working
> with other repos? If so, then you are right, and it takes me a while
> to understand it and get over it.
>
Fact: we voted against having it.
Fact: you guys continue to use it (did you vote on it?)
Guess: If we asked you guys to get rid of the Repo tag in corporation
with us, you'd probably say no.
Fact: We haven't asked you to remove the repo tag, we respect the
decision making process that you used to use a repo tag but we came to a
different conclusion for EPEL.
Fact: the sky isn't falling.
If you have another problem, bring it to us and don't assume we'll be
against you. Obviously I can't speak for everyone but I take every
decision seriously and based on its merit. You're assuming this is just
the start of EPEL completely ignoring 3rd party repos and it's just
not. I will say the tone of the email that started this thread is not
one of corporation, it's one of flame baiting and instigation, knock it off.
-Mike
More information about the epel-devel-list
mailing list