el-4 confusion, misstatement on Wiki?
fedora at leemhuis.info
Wed Aug 1 04:40:52 UTC 2007
On 31.07.2007 22:19, Karsten Wade wrote:
> Is this inaccurate/old?
It's IMHO accurate, but they wording maybe could be improved.
> If so, what do we want to say instead?
"We are doing EPEL4 and if you look for a SRPM to take as base besides
looking at the FC-3 branch please also take a look at those from
http://centos.karan.org/, as those packages are known to work for EL4
and tested there. "
More information about the epel-devel-list