el-4 confusion, misstatement on Wiki?
Stephen John Smoogen
smooge at gmail.com
Wed Aug 1 18:57:48 UTC 2007
On 7/31/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:
> On 31.07.2007 22:19, Karsten Wade wrote:
> > Is this inaccurate/old?
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#head-8d21749b79a31472a018664cc02e7f248e53fe1e
> It's IMHO accurate, but they wording maybe could be improved.
> > If so, what do we want to say instead?
> "We are doing EPEL4 and if you look for a SRPM to take as base besides
> looking at the FC-3 branch please also take a look at those from
> http://centos.karan.org/, as those packages are known to work for EL4
> and tested there. "
What about 3 and 2 :)?
[As I have to take a bunch of 5 stuff and recompile it on 2 because
the 3rd party software runs on 2 but wants newer stuff... whee.]
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"
More information about the epel-devel-list