clamav for epel looking for reviewer
Stephen John Smoogen
smooge at gmail.com
Wed Dec 5 21:13:35 UTC 2007
On Dec 5, 2007 11:31 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> wrote:
> I submitted a while ago a review request for a new spec for clamav in
> EPEL. So far I haven't gotten any reviewers interested in it...
> If anyone would like to review it that would be great.
> I would be happy to also trade reviews.
> It would be nice to get this in so EPEL has a nice new up to date and
authorize> working clamav.
Ok... my opinions aren't going to be the greatest as I am really out
of practice.. but here are some general questions
1) Is massive perl patches ok for Fedora packages or is it better to
generate the patch as a file and apply it directly. When I do it
myself, I prefer the second as it doesnt break my auto-buildsystem as
much as pulling in perl etc when I don't need it.
2) file creation from inside of the SPEC. Is it better to have them as
seperate files or use cat inside the SPEC? Again.. I prefer seperate
files.. but I can understand having it in the spec means fix once
versus remember to fix a file you forgot about.
3) The generation of the UID is using whatever useradd gives it. Does
this fit in with the Fedora/EPEL standards?
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"
More information about the epel-devel-list