clamav for epel looking for reviewer
kevin at tummy.com
Fri Dec 7 16:31:28 UTC 2007
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 11:26:46 -0600
steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 07:39:51PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > There isn't any guideline either way. I usually prefer to use
> > patches myself, but this spec is based on one from Dag, and he used
> > the perl substitutions in there, so I left it in order to keep
> > close to his spec.
> So EPEL clamav is going to look like Dag's, not like the "regular"
> Fedora clamav?
Thats my hope.
> I'm not really a fan of the Fedora clamav packages, but I do have to
> live with them (for amavisd-new). How much pain is this fork going to
> cause me?
I don't know, but I would love to hear. Do you want me to investigate?
Or can you take a look at the clamav packages and see?
I suspect this package would work with amavisd-new much easier than the
> Honestly, I think I'd rather volunteer to maintain Enrico's clamav
> spec in EPEL than even think about maintaining forked amavisd-new
Can we see how much difference there would be first?
I would also be willing to co-maintain the epel amavisd-new if it would
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the epel-devel-list