clamav for epel looking for reviewer

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 11:26:46 -0600
steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 07:39:51PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > There isn't any guideline either way. I usually prefer to use
> > patches myself, but this spec is based on one from Dag, and he used
> > the perl substitutions in there, so I left it in order to keep
> > close to his spec.
> 
> So EPEL clamav is going to look like Dag's, not like the "regular"
> Fedora clamav?

Thats my hope. 

> I'm not really a fan of the Fedora clamav packages, but I do have to
> live with them (for amavisd-new).  How much pain is this fork going to
> cause me?

I don't know, but I would love to hear. Do you want me to investigate?
Or can you take a look at the clamav packages and see? 
I suspect this package would work with amavisd-new much easier than the
fedora one. 

> Honestly, I think I'd rather volunteer to maintain Enrico's clamav
> spec in EPEL than even think about maintaining forked amavisd-new
> specs.

Can we see how much difference there would be first? 
I would also be willing to co-maintain the epel amavisd-new if it would
help. 

> 
> Steve

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20071207/cea98793/attachment.sig>