updates in builders?

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Mon Dec 10 20:19:40 UTC 2007

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:11:53 -0700
Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> wrote:

> Personally, my vote is to always add the updates in. 
> It's easier to tell people that they must have an updated system in
> order to use EPEL packages. 
> Any other thoughts?

I agree with Kevin.  The latest updates should be made available in the
buildroot.  The /only/ time where this might not be done is at a point
release date, where a /lot/ of updates will be released.  Depending on
how EPEL works with CentOS, there might be a delay at this point.

Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20071210/14a41ea0/attachment.sig>

More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list