BUG: clamav packages badly broken
florin at andrei.myip.org
Sun Dec 30 04:37:09 UTC 2007
Florin Andrei wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> Why can't a volunteer create and maintain a clamav configuration add-on
>> package, which offers a single system-wide clamav daemon if that is
>> requested by the clamav user base in Fedora/EPEL?
> That sounds good enough. Still not perfect, but it's something that can
> be lived with.
By the way, the _name_ of the package is important. I'm not picking nits
(I hope), I'm just thinking of the poor souls who might get trapped by
the existing clamav packages and break their systems. It should be
something that is self-explanatory when looking at the list provided by
"yum install clamav\*"
"clamav-standalone-daemon" or something like that.
More information about the epel-devel-list