Release and update procedure for EPEL
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Tue Feb 27 19:46:04 UTC 2007
Matthias Saou (thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net) said:
> - Do we want a moving (and potentially breaking) set of packages which
> is constantly being updated?
> - De we want a fixed set of packages when a RHEL release is made and
> focus on major bugfixes and security updates from there on?
>
> Or maybe something in between, or even both at the same time in
> separate repositories... all is possible, as long as we have enough man
> power to make it happen.
I'd lean somewhat towards the latter. If we actually intend to maintain
stuff for 7 years, we're not going to be wanting to do that many upgrades.
Are packagers really signing up for backporting?
Bill
More information about the epel-devel-list
mailing list