resolution for python-imaging in EPEL

Joel Andres Granados jgranado at
Tue Jul 17 15:35:27 UTC 2007

Daniel Riek wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 17:01 +0200, Joel Andres Granados wrote:
>> Question:  was the fact that python-imaging got introduced to RHELClient 
>> and not Server a conscious determination or
>> was it a mistake?
>> if it was a conscious determination, what are the policies that dictate 
>> when and how this occurs? and where can they be found?
> I think it was a side effect of the decision to move whatever required
> it to the Client but not the core Server (need to review that). There is
> no publicly available policy document on this, but in general packages
> that are pulled in by another package, move to the repository of that
> other package. It also was a mistake because I could have forseen that
> sofware wants to use it.
> Regards,

I'm the maintainer in RHEL for this package.  do I need some special 
considerations or do I just rebuild for 5.1?

> Daniel
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list at

Joel Andres Granados

More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list