resolution for python-imaging in EPEL

[Joel Andres Granados]

Daniel Riek wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 17:01 +0200, Joel Andres Granados wrote:
>   
>>>>     
>>>>         
>> Question:  was the fact that python-imaging got introduced to RHELClient 
>> and not Server a conscious determination or
>> was it a mistake?
>> if it was a conscious determination, what are the policies that dictate 
>> when and how this occurs? and where can they be found?
>>     
> I think it was a side effect of the decision to move whatever required
> it to the Client but not the core Server (need to review that). There is
> no publicly available policy document on this, but in general packages
> that are pulled in by another package, move to the repository of that
> other package. It also was a mistake because I could have forseen that
> sofware wants to use it.
>
> Regards,
>   

I'm the maintainer in RHEL for this package.  do I need some special 
considerations or do I just rebuild for 5.1?
thx.

> Daniel
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>   


-- 
Joel Andres Granados