Voting proposal for tomorrows meeting: Repotags in EPEL

[Jon Ciesla]

+1

> Hi!
>
> I'd like to get the repotags issue of the table. The Steering Committee
> talked about it, but no consensus could be found. But I'd really find
> some agreement tomorrow to get things moving again.
>
> So I'd suggest we put this up for voting:
>
> ----
> == Proposal for the use of repotags for EPEL ==
>
> The EPEL Steering Committee hereby issues that it wants to use a ".epel"
> repotag for all newly build packages in the EPEL repositories for EL4
> and EL5.
>
> We hereby like to ask the Packaging Committee to bless the use of
> repotags for EPEL.
>
> If such a blessing occurred we'd further kindly ask the Packaging
> Committee for suggestions how to technical realize repotags in EPEL. The
> EPEL steering committee is of course willing to help with that; the EPEL
> Steering Committee receives the right to veto the technical solution
> from the Packaging Committee, but expects not to use that veto right..
>
> ---- EOF
>
> Can we agree on this? Or does anyone want something different? Any
> addition/modifications?
>
> Cu
> thl
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>


-- 
novus ordo absurdum