rename fedora-usermgmt?

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:47:27PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 05.03.2007 13:18, Axel Thimm wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:07:42PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >>Just my 2 cent: Yes, we need to find a solution, whatever that might 
> >>look like. Writing and enforcing a fedora-usermgmt successor could be 
> >>one,
> >not really, it moves the problem from a global one to a site-specific
> >one. We need to deal with it on a global scale.
> 
> Maybe. I never looked to much into this shit, but seems to me all 
> solutions so far are painful or hard to achieve, so we have to find the 
> worst evil, whatever that might look like...

The worst? ;)

> >>extending the UID/GID space another one. Someone just needs to drive
> >>the whole issue forward and get it approved by the Fedora community,
> >>FPC and FESCo.
> >I'd vote for thl, go thl, go! :)
> 
> -1 (enough on my plate already)

Could you perhaps try to find a volunteer in the fesco group?

> >>But the current mix of using fedora-usermgmt in some packages and
> >>not using it in others just sucks.
> >That's why we should allow it to infest the RHEL world, too.
> 
> Shouldn't?

Yes, looks like we both like to argue against ourselves ;)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20070305/0fe2d565/attachment.sig>