Release and update procedure for EPEL
Mike McGrath
mmcgrath at redhat.com
Tue Mar 6 16:03:39 UTC 2007
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Ummm. No. I don't think RH still maintains 4. Or 4U1. Or 4U2. So we
> don't either. All updates are going against the latest (misnomed)
> 'quarterly' update. And I don't think that SL does it any different,
> although I might be wrong there. Because every quarterly update is a big
> update set against the previous one (including updates).
>
> So I'm not too sure about what you are talking about.
>
> Cheers,
>
This is something we can change later. Lets keep it simple for now and
if an issue comes up we can discuss it as a real example instead of
guessing what problems will come up. The releases are just a snapshot
of the rolling updates at some point in time. Its pretty arbitrary AFAIK.
-Mike
More information about the epel-devel-list
mailing list