package stability
Mike McGrath
mmcgrath at redhat.com
Wed Mar 7 22:54:14 UTC 2007
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Mike McGrath (mmcgrath at redhat.com) said:
>
>> Unlike in 'official' RHEL, I'd think the emphasis here is just on best
>> effort for stability. As long as we're cautious I think it will be fine.
>>
>
> Anything we do should be very well documented, along the lines of:
>
> "API and ABI stability for packages in EPEL is NOT guaranteed. If you are
> an ISV, you should not base your software on these packages, or, if you do,
> be prepared to ship your own version."
>
> Bill
At the same time though it would be nice to get ISV's actually
maintaining / co-maintaining packages.
-Mike
More information about the epel-devel-list
mailing list