RFC: Package maintenance and update policy for EPEL -- take 1

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Thu Mar 15 01:16:46 UTC 2007


On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:45:01AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> kernel-modules further are not allowed, as they can disturb the base
> kernel easily.

Are we sure we really want that? The same argument applies to any
daemon as well, and kernel modules are considered an added value by
most RHEL consumers (but not RHEL kernel developers ;)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20070315/216cd029/attachment.sig>


More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list