package stability

Sat Mar 3 10:51:14 UTC 2007

On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 10:26:01AM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Do we want to keep API/ABI stable over the corresponding RHEL release?

It would be interesting to have a document that described RH's specs
in this area. E.g. which API/ABI are more important that others. RHEL
has certainly kept some parts more flexible than others, for example
wireless API/ABI on almost each kernel update.

It's probably a weighing of pros and cons per case.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20070303/ba293567/attachment.sig>