package stability
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Thu Mar 8 12:42:55 UTC 2007
Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:19:50PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
>>>
>> Unlike in 'official' RHEL, I'd think the emphasis here is just on best
>> effort for stability. As long as we're cautious I think it will be fine.
>
> I personnally think that it is a bad idea. In my opinion there should be
> no difference between EPEL and RHEL packages.
I'm with Mike here, that EPEL simply make a best effort, to be more in
line with what (Fedora) Extras does.
-- Rex
More information about the epel-devel-list
mailing list