package stability

Rex Dieter rdieter at math.unl.edu
Thu Mar 8 12:42:55 UTC 2007


Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:19:50PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
>>>  
>> Unlike in 'official' RHEL, I'd think the emphasis here is just on best 
>> effort for stability.  As long as we're cautious I think it will be fine.
> 
> I personnally think that it is a bad idea. In my opinion there should be
> no difference between EPEL and RHEL packages.

I'm with Mike here, that EPEL simply make a best effort, to be more in 
line with what (Fedora) Extras does.

-- Rex




More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list