Rebuild for RHEL5 final
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue Mar 27 18:13:34 UTC 2007
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:29:05PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Now that I've thought about it some more I don't like that plan that
> much anymore, as then it's not possible to differentiate if people have
> the old or the new package installed. Sure, that shouldn't be many
> people yet, but nevertheless it could create problems.
The reason for not doing so were that one would fork all specfiles.
> Opinions? Just ignore that? Or simply do a script-build mass rebuild of
> EPEL5 with increased %release?
I'd say ignore it. The current users of EPEL are on this list.
We'll have also other issues to resolve (like qt4 on EPEL4 > qt4 on
RHEL5, and if we check we'll probably find more) and we need to keep a
rawhide attitude (aka flexibility) otherwise we'll have to start using
epochs before launching.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20070327/7ba326d8/attachment.sig>
More information about the epel-devel-list
mailing list