wither clamav?

[Rahul Sundaram]

Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 02:13:56AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Yes. This is a different branch. While maintaining the spec files close 
>> to Fedora Package Collection is a good goal it is pretty much impossible 
>> to do it in all cases due the different release strategies between these 
>> repositories. It would be good to discuss with the Fedora package 
> 
> In that case it is not the reason behind the change, so I am not sure
> that this is valid. Indeed having a difference between EPEL and F
> branches to accomodate third party repository in EPEL doesn't seems that
> right (I am not saying that we shouldn't accomodate for third party
> repository, but that we should do the same for that matter in EPEL and
> Fedora).

Which is why I suggested talking to the maintainer first which you 
trimmed out.

Rahul