EPEL-5 and RHEL 5.1 packages

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Nov 8 21:22:28 UTC 2007


On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:08:10 +0100
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:

> Which still does not solve the problem that started this thread...

Correct.  To solve the problem at the start of this thread, perhaps it
would make sense to pre-populate the buildsystem with the next point
release bits at the same time they're being staged for release, or
close to it, so that EPEL can on the same day of a point release claim
that they support that release.  Just takes more cooperation between
EPEL leaders and Red Hat.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20071108/4ecfbba0/attachment.sig>


More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list