mock 0.8.9 for EPEL-5

Rich Megginson rmeggins at redhat.com
Tue Nov 20 21:44:39 UTC 2007


Michael E Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 11:29:29PM +0200, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
>   
>> On 11/20/2007 11:20 PM, Michael E Brown wrote:
>>     
>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 02:05:46PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>>  
>>>       
>>>> Ok I am going to ask the harder question :). How does this affect
>>>> RHEL-4 and such?
>>>>    
>>>>         
>>> Does not affect RHEL4. I dont intend to upgrade mock in RHEL4 at this
>>> time, as I dont have a box to test this out on. Nor do I think it worth
>>> the effort to do so, as I doubt there are any users (or at least *very*
>>> few, if any.)
>>>  
>>>       
>> I have to contradict you here. To my knowledge Centos 4 is quite popular 
>> and even though lots of people have switched their devel boxes to C5 or 
>> Fedora, those still using C4 need love, too.
>>     
>
> Yes, I know Centos 4 and RHEL4 are popular. My point was that I didnt
> think that many people actually ran mock on them. I've gotten very
> little in the way of feedback from people running mock on EL4. The vast
> majority of people (that I know about) running mock do so on
> Fedora-<recent>, or RHEL5.
>
> As always, there are a very few people who might actually be running
> mock there, I just havent heard from them.
>   
I tried it - I had to hunt through the epel testing repo to find a 
yum/mock that would actually work on rhel4.  However, if I can happily 
use fedora to build el4 packages with mock, then I would rather do that 
than actually have to run el4 just to build packages.

So with mock 0.8.x, I can build el4 and el5 packages on fedora?
> If there is a large contingent of people running mock on EL-4, I would
> be happy to update mock on EL-4 to latest if there is A) demand, and B)
> somebody who is willing to test and (possibly) submit patches if there
> are issues.
> --
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>   

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3245 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20071120/7b7cefbd/attachment.bin>


More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list