EPEL-5 and RHEL 5.1 packages

[Johnny Hughes]

Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:08:10 +0100
> Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:
> 
>> Which still does not solve the problem that started this thread...
> 
> Correct.  To solve the problem at the start of this thread, perhaps it
> would make sense to pre-populate the buildsystem with the next point
> release bits at the same time they're being staged for release, or
> close to it, so that EPEL can on the same day of a point release claim
> that they support that release.  Just takes more cooperation between
> EPEL leaders and Red Hat.

How does that help the millions of CentOS users out there?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20071108/1469da6a/attachment.sig>