sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Sun Apr 6 18:15:21 UTC 2008
Brad Bell wrote:
> I am a Fedora package maintainer and am considering creating an EPEL
> In the guidelines on
> under the heading
> Some examples of what package updates are fine or not
> it appears that package updates should:
> 1. be backward compatible
> 2. fix a serious bug
> It seems that, once a package is released in EL-n, new features are not
> a reason to create a new release of the package in EL-n. An update with
> the purpose of adding new features should wait for EL-(n+1) ?
The simple rule: Don't release an update unless absolutely necessary.
This is to avoid regressions.
More information about the epel-devel-list