OCaml 3.10.2

Michael Stahnke mastahnke at gmail.com
Tue Aug 26 04:41:24 UTC 2008


On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 01:26:59AM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
>> On 08/26/2008 01:16 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:10:14AM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Seriously speaking, the main difficulty in maintaining packages, is
>>>> the total absence of feedback from users *before* any updates.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well yes, that is the problem.  I'm aware of a number of OCaml / EPEL
>>> users.  They mainly seem to be people using it to teach university
>>> courses ...
>>>
>>> Rich.
>>>
>> Maybe you could leave the older ocaml as such and create a new ocaml5 ?
>
> That's another possibility.  But I've never seen a working parallel
> OCaml compiler install.  It's definitely not as easy as it is with gcc
> to do parallel / compat installs ...  A question for upstream, I
> think.
>
> Rich.
>
> --
> Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
> virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
> powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
> http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>

I know we have at least 1 app ( maybe more) that would work a lot
better with the newer version, (like it would build).  I'll vote for
the update.

stahnma




More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list