EPEL only packages? Review process?
pertusus at free.fr
Sun Dec 7 19:02:25 UTC 2008
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 07:57:37AM -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> Sorry, I should have clarified better. The uuid module I'm packaging
> above is part of _python_ in Fedora (2.5 and newer?).
> So this module doesn't fall under those guidelines... :)
I have done such a package for tetex-lineno which was included in
fedora package already. It is better, in my opinion, if you have
Obsoletes added in fedora packages and in later RHEL package that
obsolete your package. But it may be a lengthy process...
More information about the epel-devel-list