Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-02-27
bugs.michael at gmx.net
Thu Feb 28 21:03:00 UTC 2008
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:15:02 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:08:09 -0000, Fedora Extras repoclosure wrote:
> > > ======================================================================
> > > Broken packages in fedora-epel-5-i386:
> > >
> > > amavisd-new-2.4.5-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Archive::Zip)
> > > evolution-bogofilter-0.2.0-5.el5.1.i386 requires libeutil.so.0
> > > mail-notification-evolution-plugin-4.0-2.el5.i386 requires libeutil.so.0
> > > mlvirsh-0.3.3.0-6.el5.i386 requires libvirt.so.0
> > > ocaml-libvirt-0.3.3.0-6.el5.i386 requires libvirt.so.0
> > > ooo2txt-0.0.6-3.el5.noarch requires perl(Archive::Zip)
> > > virt-top-0.3.3.0-6.el5.i386 requires libvirt.so.0
> > The RHEL virtualisation pkgs are in a separate repo. This is
> > missing in the yum cfg.
> > As why perl(Archive::Zip) is missing in RHEL5 and not CentOS5
> > puzzles me (right now -- I've not examined it). Same applies to
> > libeutil.so.0 as that is evidence of an ABI-incompatible update
> > somewhere.
> It has to do with the various 'channels': perl(Archive::Zip) and
> thunderbird do not seem to be in the server channels but are in the
> client channels.. I am guessing there are vice versa ones too... I run
> into this quite a bit which is why we ended up with a non standard
> through it all into one repo to do our installs from.
Right. I see it was run against a RHEL5 Server repo and apparently not
against what the buildsys uses.
Btw, the rc-report script can take multiple repoclosure output files as
in input arguments. No need to concatenate them.
More information about the epel-devel-list