[SPAM] Re: New Zenoss RPMs
pertusus at free.fr
Fri Feb 29 14:22:57 UTC 2008
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:19:04AM +0200, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> Michael A. Peters wrote:
>> I think I figured out the Python issue - the general way something gets
>> into EPEL is through Fedora review process first - and since Python 2.4 is
>> not shipped in a supported release of Fedora, that may be difficult.
>> Is that what the deal is?
>> Does EPEL have a second path in for these scenarios?
> Read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag (pay special attention
> to the "conditionals" part) and use it to differentiate among systems
> during build time. Just BuildRequire and use python-2.4 where it is
> available and python-compat-2.4 in the rest.
Is there a python-compat-2.4 somewhere in fedora and RHEL?
More information about the epel-devel-list