Unstable EPEL? (frequent package updates)

[Xavier Lamien]

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip at kanarip.com>
wrote:

> Michael A. Peters wrote:
>
>> There are a few exceptions. I do think RHEL is justified in moving Firefox
>> to FF3. The reason is twofold -
>>
>> 1) Firefox has a huge codebase. It would take extreme amount of man power
>> to continue to maintain FF 1.x without upstream.
>>
>> 2) The web evolves quickly, and a browser must keep in touch with modern
>> web innovations, particularly in the area of javascript and CSS
>> implementation.
>>
>>
> A small addition here; RHEL does so by releasing a minor update to the
> entire operating system (5.2) - so everyone knows to look for changes like
> these. Is this something EPEL can do as well?
>
> EPEL 5.1/nethack-3.4.3
>
> EPEL 5.2/nethack-4.0 (for the right reasons)
>
> Just a thought.


I think that will imply to add another epel branch.
such as  move epel to EL-5.1 and then add EL-5.2


>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jeroen van Meeuwen
> -kanarip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20080702/0dc4ea0f/attachment.htm>