Are we building against CentOS 5.2 or 5.1
Michael Schwendt
bugs.michael at gmx.net
Fri Jul 18 09:52:15 UTC 2008
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:44:00 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Just so I don't mailbomb everyone again. Changing:
> >
> > process_deps 5 i386 testing yes
> >
> > to
> >
> > process_deps 5 i686 testing yes
> >
> > ?
>
> Ah, no, I forgot that somebody added that stuff. In the context of
> process_deps this additional line near the top, where a similar thing
> is done for ppc, would be needed (I only see a diff of a script called
> checkEpel.sh):
>
> [ $arch == "i386" ] && arch_label=i686 || arch_label=$arch
As the 'OR' is troublesome, it ought to be dropped in favour of giving
$arch_label a default value earlier. Top of function should look like this:
process_deps()
{
release=$1
arch=$2
testing=$3
mail=$4
[ -z $4 ] && mail="no" || mail="yes"
- [ $arch = "ppc" ] && arch_label=ppc64 || arch_label=$arch
+ arch_label=$arch
+ [ $arch == "i386" ] && arch_label=i686
+ [ $arch == "ppc" ] && arch_label=ppc64
command="/usr/local/bin/rc-modified -d mdcache -n -c $YUM_CONF_LOC -a
More information about the epel-devel-list
mailing list