EPEL Meeting: Last Call for topics for 2008-03-26
Michael Stahnke
mastahnke at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 22:35:31 UTC 2008
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> wrote:
> I probably won't make the meeting.
>
> > RHEL Meta Data
> As I tried to explain in the past, this is difficult, because it's an
> unknown target. Some people want full search capabilities of RHN, and
> we can't easily provide that. For most cases, however, repoquery and
> yum give enough good information.
> The most common use cases I see are:
> * What's the version of package XYZ in RHEL? (Use yum/repoquery)
> * Is package XYZ included in RHEL? (Use yum/repoquery)
> * What are the differences in packages between CentOS and RHEL ? (
> http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.1/#head-bcaed48ff64328cc23cbef681289c5d8ae7efa05)
>
> More obscure cases
> * What package provides lib-XYZ?
> * How do I see the changelog for packages? (Repoquery again)
> * Is package foo included in other Red Hat channel other than base
> RHEL. (This one is a bit harder).
> * What packages are coming up in RHEL version X.Y+1 that will
> obsolete EPEL packages? (again, not a clear way)
>
>
>
>
>
> stahnma
>
Basically, if we could put a really nice front end on repoquery, most
problems would be easily solved. I think some of the issues are not
everyone having an EL box to build upon.
More information about the epel-devel-list
mailing list