sponsorship from RH ?
Gilboa Davara
gilboad at gmail.com
Sun May 25 14:49:51 UTC 2008
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 17:34 +0300, Balint Cristian wrote:
> Hello EPEL folks,
>
> Is it possible from RH side to sponsor me with
> (lets say RHEL 5.X) license for be able to maintain
> properly the GIS interest group ?
>
>
> Wiki of GIS, list of packages which I maintain
> from booth professional reasons and hobby:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GIS?highlight=(GIS)
>
> I would mention packages are quite picky and
> hard to maintain, complexity is pretty high, I
> myself maintain for multiple reasons tham in fedora.
>
> Task is quite difficult without a RHEL desktop,
> frecvent ABI changes require to develop sort
> of compat-* library, and its not so easy to test
> product properly in the lack of properly licensed
> RHEL desktop. Unfortunatley upstream release cycle
> is faster than RHEL release one, and new futures are
> always requested before a new RHEL product series.
>
> Just using blindly the plague client its near impossible
> to do this task, I personaly fail to do it for EPEL at highest
> quality with version track and compatibility changes
> but its an easy task for fedora since there are no strict
> rules, not to much care if radical upgrade is involved.
>
> I see GIS interest group as a good ground base for all
> GIS professionists, and finaly RH products could cover
> this professional area too, wich was completly uncovered
> before i took the task, and i would like to keep it on.
>
> Also I would mention that other people make money
> out of these packages and support, I did it for free
> of course, since these days it quite intersect with my
> work and professional area in wich i am involved.
>
> Here is one example: http://www.gdf-hannover.de/
>
> Personaly quite dissapointed how they support distros,
> but its personal opinion dont want any polemics with
> tham, however I salute their initiative.
>
> Obviously i am a RH fan since 1996, quite difficult
> to distract my opinion and blame anything about
> RHEL/Fedora quality.
>
> Best Regards,
> Cristian.
>
You should consider using CentOS. [1]
It's 99.9% compatible with RHEL.
- Gilboa
[1] http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=15
More information about the epel-devel-list
mailing list