sponsorship from RH ?

lonely wolf wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro
Sun May 25 22:48:48 UTC 2008


On 05/26/2008 01:47 AM, lonely wolf wrote:
> On 05/25/2008 10:19 PM, Balint Cristian wrote:
>>> The big issue with the confusion is that Fedora's bugzilla is Red
>>> Hat's bugzilla. So if I want to push an EPEL bug I report to "redhat".
>>> If I want to report a fedora bug.. I report to "redhat". This is one
>>> area where Red Hat's brand squashes Fedora's brand in people's minds.
>>> Squashes it dead. People will equate EPEL == Red Hat for many
>>> reasons.. but that is the one that stands out in my mind the most.
>>> (next to epel-devel-list at redhat.com versus fedoraproject.org or some
>>> such thing).
>>>     
>>
>>
>>
>> Hmm ... moment, i might isnt EPEL ment to be an extension for RHEL ?!
>> I mean quite realated and ment as an extension for commercial RHEL, 
>> or isnt it ?
>>   
> EPEL contine pachete provenite din FEDORA si care functioneaza in 
> RHEL. Iar 99% din maintaineri (inclusiv eu) testeaza folosind Centos.
>
> wolfy (care e si un mic developer Centos, nu doar Fedora sponsor)
>
Sorry for the noise, it was meant for Cristi only , I forgot to change 
the recipient :(




More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list