incompatible packaging between EPEL and DAG/rpmforge

[Karsten 'quaid' Wade]

On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 08:13 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:

> I think you will likely find the political challenges more difficult to
> overcome than the technical ones if you're looking to get things sync'd
> up and nice between the two repo's. :)

Is it really fair to call it 'political'?

Fedora has a packaging standard, a method for changing that standard,
and reasons things become the standard.  Is calling a packaging decision
'political' supported by the history?

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20080527/86e2fff9/attachment.sig>