Need to move Monday meeting
jonstanley at gmail.com
Sat Sep 13 23:00:31 UTC 2008
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> wrote:
> offering the layered products in EPEL is like CentOS vs RHEL. If you
> need support/subscription, you know what to do.
Indeed it is. For instance, I am using Fedora Directory Server in a
production RHEL environment right now, because I needed something that
would work *right then*. I'm now in the process of procuring RHDS to
replace it. Does RHDS offer any features that FDS doesn't? No. Is FDS
supported? No. It's the support that I require, not being a directory
server expert myself, so RHDS it is.
I really do think that most customers grok that. Again, I could be wrong too.
More information about the epel-devel-list