[BZ 432811] EPEL key in RHEL

[Till Maas]

On Thu September 18 2008, David Juran wrote:

> yes, there is the problem of keeping the keys in sync. In my opinion it
> doesn't make much sense to sign a package with a key that is contained in
> that very package. So what other approaches are there? Would it be possible

For the beginning, it would be nice to have the fingerprint of the key added 
to this page:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/fingerprints

Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20080918/43efa6c1/attachment.sig>