[BZ 432811] EPEL key in RHEL

Till Maas opensource at till.name
Thu Sep 18 17:32:33 UTC 2008

On Thu September 18 2008, David Juran wrote:

> yes, there is the problem of keeping the keys in sync. In my opinion it
> doesn't make much sense to sign a package with a key that is contained in
> that very package. So what other approaches are there? Would it be possible

For the beginning, it would be nice to have the fingerprint of the key added 
to this page:


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20080918/43efa6c1/attachment.sig>

More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list