RHEL 5.3
Robert Scheck
robert at fedoraproject.org
Fri Jan 23 07:43:23 UTC 2009
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> pexepct ( congrats rsc, your package got in unmodified)
That already happend for RHEL 5.2, that's nothing new for RHEL 5.3.
> In accordance with out guideline of not replacing RHEL packages we need to
> remove them. there are possibly others. Im going to get together a list of
> packages that moved from EPEL to RHEL. I will mark them dead in cvs and
> remove them from the repos.
Again, can we please move an older version of pexpect (e.g. -0 rather -1 or
so) for EPEL? You did not answer my question until now.
Greetings,
Robert
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20090123/e9d7e5e0/attachment.sig>
More information about the epel-devel-list
mailing list