RHEL 5.3

Robert Scheck robert at fedoraproject.org
Fri Jan 23 07:43:23 UTC 2009


On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> pexepct ( congrats rsc, your package got in unmodified)

That already happend for RHEL 5.2, that's nothing new for RHEL 5.3.

> In accordance with out guideline of not replacing RHEL packages we need to 
> remove them.  there are possibly others.  Im going to get together a list of 
> packages that moved from EPEL to RHEL.  I will mark them dead in cvs and 
> remove them from the repos.

Again, can we please move an older version of pexpect (e.g. -0 rather -1 or
so) for EPEL? You did not answer my question until now. 


Greetings,
  Robert
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20090123/e9d7e5e0/attachment.sig>


More information about the epel-devel-list mailing list