pexepct is in RHEL and should be dropped from EPEL

[Rahul Sundaram]

Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:

> 
> Red Hat GSS obviously takes advantage with EPEL, as they can often just 
> grab a package from EPEL X to be included in RHEL X.Y+1 whenever they 
> feel like it. I'm pretty sure they put enough QA effort in on such 
> package, but meanwhile they do not even bother to notify the current 
> EPEL maintainer(s). 

You are blaming the wrong people. GSS is just support people. They don't 
involve themselves with maintaining packages or QA.

Rahul